Author Archives: cuverkuca

Ovaj blog je posvećen istraživanju društvene teme izvoza velikog broja mješanaca ,pasa i mačaka iz Hrvatske te susjednih zemalja za Njemačku putem ilegalnih, organiziranih transporta.
Tema me zanima kao iskrenog ljubitelja životinja za koje mislim da zaslužuju puno poštovanje
Hvala na pažnji,
M Kervatin





“There are millions of stray dogs in eastern and southern Europe. Many of these are waiting to be imported into the richer part of Europe. In Hungary, there are approx. 2 million stray dogs, and Romania published figures of 4-6 million. In recent times it has become very popular to import these dogs into Norway. There are many different websites which post street dogs for adoption. It is difficult to quantify exactly how many stray dogs have already come to Norway, but in January 2012 twenty to thirty dogs were expected from Romania only.

This is a large and well-organized business. There is much corruption in many of the countries which provide these dogs, which means that there is every reason to question the veterinary certificates accompanying the animals. FSA has found counterfeit veterinary certificates, but not enough to prohibit these imports.”

Importing stray dogs – a threat to public health and welfare?

By Kari Johansen and Jan Johansen

This article contains the health and some of the economic consequences of Norway’s adaptation to the EEA Agreement. It is written against the background of increasing imports of stray dogs into Norway. The two authors are involved in the general health of our community, as well as being dog owners themselves. The Veterinary Institute in Oslo has recently published a risk assessment of infectious and parasitic diseases in relation to stray dogs from Eastern and Southern Europe. We refer to this risk assesment in our article. The article will also deal with zoonoses, which is the term for diseases transmitted between animals and humans. We have for a long time quietly monitored several groups which are responsible for importing stray dogs, and we are deeply shaken by the attitudes of these people. They minimize the importance of the parasite findings and they demonize the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (NFSA) (Mattilsynet). This is the government agency which monitors animal health. Parts of this article will be linked to our experience with these groups.

“I see no problem with dogs running free in a kindergarden area. When Tinka is in heat I let her play in a daycare center close by.” From Pogreška! Referenca hiperveze nije valjana. (from a dog web page)

Have you ever considered that in eight to ten years’ time your child or grandchild might die because it played in a kindergarden where someone had walked his or her dog? Or that your child might get sick because it greeted the neighbouring dog which licked its face or hands? After so many years, no one will connect sickness and death with this incident. Can you imagine that in a few years you may be exposed to a deadly parasitic infection while picking berries or mushrooms in the forest on a lovely autumn day? Horror Scenario? No, this could well be our reality, and we have chosen to call this. The new invisible threat in Norway!

From the Norwegian Veterinary Institute Report Series 03.01.2013:

“The number of stray dogs imported from Eastern European EU-countries has increased significantly subsequent to the easing of EU import regulations on the 1.1.2012. The EU lifted mandatory checks of rabies antibody titres prior to import, allowing for dogs to enter shortly after vaccination. A number of canine charities have actively been facilitating the import of stray dogs to Norway, in particular from Romania and Hungary. The disease status of the Norwegian dog population is considerably different from that in Eastern Europe and importing dogs from these countries will increase the risk of importing foreign

pathogens. This increased risk has been highlighted with the detection of tongueworm (Linguatula serrata), heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) and the brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus) in dogs imported from Romania in the last few weeks. In addition, Babesia canis has, previously, been detected in dogs imported from Hungary, Lithuania and Slovakia.

The Norwegian Veterinary Institute has carried out a quick risk assessment, regarding the import of stray dogs from Eastern Europe to Norway, in order to evaluate the current situation and provide recommendations. Only a few pathogens have been fully assessed due to time requirements and the list is not exhaustive. However, the pathogens included are those that we consider to be of greatest significance to the Norwegian dog population. Some of the recommendations are of a general nature and, once further information regarding the pathogen status in the exporting country becomes available, the advice can be

adjusted accordingly.

The risk of importing a pathogen increases with the number of imported dogs. We do not know how many dogs are imported into Norway annually nor from which country they originated. Estimating future import numbers is therefore challenging. However, it is realistic to estimate that the number of imported dogs from Eastern Europe during the course of the next decade would be around 5000 animals, given that 200 stray dogs have been imported into Norway, from Romania alone, during the previous six months. The probability of importing a pathogen is high, given the number of animals being imported, even if it is only

found in a few individuals. We calculate that there is a 99% probability of importing a pathogen even though it only occurs in one in 1000 stray dogs, whilst there is 39% probability for importing a pathogen that occurs in one in 10 000 stray dogs.


The probability of importing specific pathogens and the impact on animal and human health are summarized in the figure below.




  •  If stray dogs continue to be imported from Eastern Europe there is a high probability that pathogens, not currently found in Norway, will be introduced. If the number of imported strays continues at the same rate (hundreds per year) then even pathogens that are only infrequently identified in the export country’s dog population may be imported.
  • There is a moderate to high probability that some of these pathogens will be able to establish in Norway. Those of particular concern are: Rabies, Leptospira spp., Brucella canis, Echinococcus spp., Linguatula serrata, and Angiostrongylus vasorum. Some of the pathogens will be able to establish in the indoor environment only, such as Strongyloides stercoralis, Ancylostoma caninum, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus.
  • Many of these pathogens can cause severe clinical disease, particularly Rabies, Leptospira, Brucella canis (in breeding kennels), Echinococcus multilocularis and Angiostrongylus vasorum and can infect humans as well as animals.
  • The current regulations are only aimed at preventing the introduction of Rabies and Echinococcus sp. and do not address other pathogens of concern. Rabies might still be introduced, despite the regulations being adhered to, if the dog is infected prior to vaccination. This route of introduction is thought to be unlikely, although not negligible, and stray dogs, with unknown health status, are of particular concern.»

Impact on animal and human health

Norway has a unique nature, and as part of our heritage we are a people who like to enjoy the great outdoors. Forestry and mountain recreation areas are located close to our cities and towns. We have wild animals like foxes in close proximity, thus experiencing potential disease carriers close to us. Norwegians gather from nature by hunting, fishing and picking berries and mushrooms. We depend on a healthy agriculture which supplies us with grain and vegetables, and where animals are grazing. This lifestyle may be threatened if we are infected by parasites foreign to us. Norway has always had good human and animal health because of very strict laws regulating the import of animals. When Norwegian authorities eased the regulatory framework to that of the EEA Agreement, it was primarily because it would be easier for Norwegians to take pets on holiday abroad. (Pet Regulation of 2003). From January 1st 2012 the government changed the regulations again and lifted the mandatory blood testing in conection with rabies vaccination. Now animals must be vaccinated 21 days before coming to Norway.

A new image of reality. When the EU regulations for the movement of pets across borders were changed in 2004, it was presented to the involved ministries. There were no objections at the time. In those days the animal health in the member states of the EU was generally good. Later the EU expanded and aquired several countries from Eastern Europe. In some of those countries neither animal health nor animal welfare was satisfactory. Norway joined a set of agreements where the terms have changed from when the contract was signed. As early as in 2001 the Akershus Farmers and Smallholders Union asked the Minister of Agriculture, Minister of Health and Minister for the Environment that border controls should be tightened again.

Later the EU regulation on pet movement has been relaxed further.

Importing dogs: A different risk scenario. There are various ways of importing live animals, and several of these give reason for concern. There is extensive organized importing of dogs with unknown health background (stray dogs and smuggled dogs), there is acquisition of breeding dogs from recognized breeders, return of Norwegian dogs which have been acompanying their owners on holidays abroad, and tourists bringing their dogs on holiday to Norway. Statistics from the FSA show that about 6 000 pets came to Norway through Gardermoen alone, in 2011. Garedermoen is Norway’s largest airport,

Many dogs are brought to our country through the Swedish border, and dogs enter Norway from Denmark on ferries. The majority of the dogs from EU countries are entering Norway through Customs but are only occasionally stopped for inspection. The FSA veterinarians are summoned only if Customs finds irregularities. Smuggled pets are not part of the import statistics, but smuggling can involve thousands of dogs each year.

Stray dogs. Lately there has been much focus in the media on the import of stray dogs. Radio, TV, various newspapers and especially NRK Brennpunkt has asked many questions about these imports.

There are millions of stray dogs in eastern and southern Europe. Many of these are waiting to be imported into the richer part of Europe. In Hungary, there are approx. 2 million stray dogs, and Romania published figures of 4-6 million. In recent times it has become very popular to import these dogs into Norway. There are many different websites which post street dogs for adoption. It is difficult to quantify exactly how many stray dogs have already come to Norway, but in January 2012 twenty to thirty dogs were expected from Romania only.

These dogs are spread across the country. One of the major players in the export to Norway, Rolda, estimated in March 2012 that it has exported over 100 dogs to Norway just from the city of Galati in Romania. There are shelters spread throughout Eastern and Southern Europe, and there are numerous sites on the Internet where you will be encouraged to adopt dogs, or donate money to them. Exports also occur to other countries such as England, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Finland to name a few.

This is a large and well-organized business. There is much corruption in many of the countries which provide these dogs, which means that there is every reason to question the veterinary certificates accompanying the animals. FSA has found counterfeit veterinary certificates, but not enough to prohibit these imports.

“Animals are worth a damn more than humans to me.” (From a stray dog web page)

“..and have a little extra for a bribe for the vet at the airport in case he shows up…..usually about 50 Lei” (From a stray dog web page)

The disease background of these dogs is unknown. The discovery of intestinal parasites, ticks, fleas and mange lately mean that there should be questions asked about the conditions in which these dogs live. Because they lack clean water and food they eat their own faeces, and thus they become both the medium and end host of parasites. These dogs live on the streets before being taken in to various shelters for adoption. The dogs are raised in conditions where survival of the fittest applies. They had to fight for food and territory. This background increases the risk of importing dogs with high levels of aggression and behaviour problems. We have seen several examples of adopted street dogs which required relocation or which were euthanized because of aggression.

The Disease Issue

Zoonosis is the term for diseases transmitted between humans and animals. We refer to the risk analysis below for a review of each disease and zoonosis. In April 2012 the FSA received, because of parasites found among street dogs, the means to take blood samples from dogs imported to Norway on arrival at Gardermoen Airport. Against this background, the National Veterinary Institute conducted a risk analysis which was published on 13 June 2012.

The Veterinary Institute concluded that “The import of street dogs from Eastern Europe is likely to introduce additional disease agents that do not exist in Norway. By importing hundreds of dogs a year there is also a large possiblity that rare agents are also imported.” The risk analysis is based on the recommendations of the World Organization for Animal Health. The Institute has made recommendations for the import of street dogs in order to minimize the risk of infection. Such recommendations will always depend on whether we can trust the veterinary certificates accompanying the dogs.

“…. I got him straight from shelter … He was in a horrible mess … green mucous in his eyes and so dirty … He had not been attending any veterinarian … They had just given his vaccinations in the shelter … .. “(From street dog group)

Rabies. Norway has not had rabies on the mainland since the 1800s. Ninety percent of rabies infections are transmitted through biting, but the disease can also be transmitted through scratching and licking. If the disease is allowed to develop far enough to show symptoms it is 100% fatal. In Sweden there have been several deaths in humans due to rabies where people were infected abroad. One example is a woman who died in 2000 after being licked by a dog traveling to Thailand.

Romania is one of Europe’s most infected countries as far as rabies is concerned. In the first six months of 2008 the Romanian veterinary laboratories tested 2 598 blood samples from different animal species. Six hundred and fifty four of these tested positive for rabies. This is a high percentage. These numbers give a good example of the dangers we expose the Norwegian public to through the import of dogs with unknown health backgrounds. Norwegian authorities have no choice but to allow the import of street dogs when the regulations on rabies vaccination and tapeworm treatment are followed. Romanian veterinary authorities fear the spread of rabies, especially outside their own borders in connection with this type of dog export. (Non-commercial movements of pets might cause rabies to be spread outside Romania’s borders). There have been several deaths in humans in Romania due to rabies in the past few years. One example is a 5 year old girl who was bitten by a street dog in December 2011. She died on 27th of February 2012.

Another girl died after being bitten by a rabies infected cat. Moreover, Romania has a current vaccination against rabies in foxes that only ends in 2016.

Several of the blood samples of imported street dogs in Norway showed too low levels of antibodies against rabies. Then we must ask: is the vaccination programme good enough? After the recent legislation which came into force January the 1st 2012, dogs may not be vaccinated until they are 3 months old, and they must wait another 21 days prior to entering Norway. Many street dogs are sick, emaciated and suffering from parasites when they enter the shelters. Such dogs are in poor condition when they are vaccinated, and their immune systems may not be good enough for the vaccine or treatment to have the desired effect.

The Department of Agriculture notes that many countries have little control of diseases in the stray dog population and that rabies remains a major problem: “Last year over 8 000 people just in Romania’s capital, Bucharest, were treated for possible rabies after dog bites. Many other diseases may also become established in the Norwegian fauna, and they will in many cases be impossible to eradicate. Apparently healthy animals may also carry disease.”

If people become infected the consequences can be deadly. In a country with rabies infections the smallest dog bite needs to be treated as if the dog is a carrier of the virus. Some people have poor tolerance towards this treatment, and it can have major side effects.

The Fox Tapeworm. Echinococcus multilocularis is relatively common in central Europe. The greatest danger of having the infection introduced to Norway is expected to be irregular imports of pets (dogs), or regular entry of pets that have not been properly treated aganst the parasite. If people are infected with eggs from the faeces they become intermediate hosts. The period from infection till they start showing symptoms can take 10-15 years. The disease causes tumor-like masses of parasitic sacs in the internal organs, especially the liver. The disease is rare in humans, but very serious. Parasite eggs are excreted in the faces and can infect humans through contact with faces or fur from infected carnivores (dogs, foxes), and contaminated soil.

In this context, it is a paradox that before 11 March 2011 we could travel with our pets into Sweden without treating them. The fox tapeworm has been found several times in Sweden in 2011, however. This shows that spreading of a new parasite is a fact. One fox was shot not far from the Norwegian border. This parasite emerged after 600 street dogs were imported to Sweden. One cannot exclude these imports as the transmitter of the disease.

We would be somewhat naive to believe that this might not happen in Norway. Swedish TV in their “investigation” has also focused on street dog imports due to irregularities in the paperwork accompanying street dogs. This was particularly so for dogs from Spain. There is no reason to believe that animals imported to Norway have a different disease background to those imported to Sweden, as we import street dogs from the same countries and through the same organizations. Various associations in Sweden, among them the Hunter Association have been rather harsh in their critisism of the Swedish authorities. They believe that the government is not doing enough to prevent a proliferation of the disease. Swedish veterinary authorities have warned against street dogs imports. “Avoid importing these dogs. I mean that one at least must think carefully before taking the dogs from other countries. There is an obvious risk that we import disease which we never had before in the country, said Eva Osterman- Lind of the National Veterinary Institute “.

In Norway veterinarians are very reluctant to treat dogs for intestinal worms. They want to identify the parasites in advance. With the large amount of traveling between Norway and Sweden and repeated treatments against the fox tapeworm, there a risk that this parasite develops a resistance to the drugs that are commonly used. (Dogs and cats which are regularly being transported between Sweden and Norway (ex. by cabin owners) should be treated regularly , and at least every 28 days, instead of at each border crossing.) (From Norwegian Institute of Public Health.)

The Scientific Committee for Food Safety, VKM, has in their risk assessment estimated that Norway will experience the first cases of the fox tapeworm within 10 years. Through the import of street dogs the risk is vastly increased of the parasite showing up at a much earlier stage. The Norwegian authorities should apply the precautionary principle to prevent the importation of the parasite via imported dogs. .

“The infection will come sooner or later …….” (From street dog group)

Multi-resistant bacteria. Even in Norway we have by now found bacteria resistant to several types of antibiotics. Due to our restrictive policy on the use of antibiotics Norway has a relatively small problem compared with that of most other countries. We appreciate that most often these bacteria are found in connection with people, but it turns out that multi-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are increasingly detected outside health institutions, and in several European countries such bacteria are now found in animals and humans in frequent contact with animals. Since MRSA bacteria in animals were detected in Europe in 2003, there has been an explosive spread. “MRSA spread in Europe is a consequence of the open market and intensive animal operations. Trade and transportation of animals lead to the spread of infection, and intensive operations such as extensive use of antibiotics make animals more vulnerable, says Madeleine Norström at the National Veterinary Institute.”

“Perhaps the largest problem with MRSA is that individuals with normal immune systems do not get sick, but can be carriers of the bacteria and infect others”, says Marianne Sunde at the National Veterinary Institute. Once the bacteria are in the community, it will be very difficult, if not impossible to control. Both the large imports into Norway of street dogs from Europe and the movement of holiday dogs across borders increases the risk that we may develop serious problems with MRSA bacteria in Norway.

Results from a health survey of street dogs imported into Norway in 2012. The discovery of Linguatula serrata, (Tongue worm), Dirofilaria immitis (Heartworm), Rhipicephalus sanguineus (brown dog tick), Babesia canis and Trichuris trichiura (Whipworm Trichuris vulpis) are extremely worrying. Several dogs had remarkably low incidences of antibodies against rabies. We have never found so many exotic diseases in imported dogs in Norway as during the spring of 2012, and we will not be surprised if new occurrences will soon dominate the news. Findings on imported street dogs in Norway confirm the claims that these animals have infestations of new diseases.

There is disagreement within the scientific community as far as tongue worm is concerned. Some veterinarians who are trained abroad fear that the parasite is more dangerous than the Veterinary Institute claims. There are indications that it might be passed directly from dog to human. In Linköping, Sweden they found the tongue worm in early 2010, when a street dog imported from Romania sneezed out a parasite of ca. 10 cm long.

In Norway, this parasite was found in a Romanian street dog for the first time in the spring of 2012.

The nightmare: infection in our children. We know from several discussion threads on the internet that many dog owners are letting their dogs loose in kindergartens, playgrounds and other areas where children congregate. It is easy to let the dogs run free because the areas are likely to be fenced. This may eventually endanger the youngest and most vulnerable in our society.

We must accept that we are in the process of importing diseases that can be lethal to people and animals, diseases which a physician in general practice or a veterinarian may not be too knowledgable about, unless they have graduated from countries where these diseases are common or they have expertise in that particular area.

Making discoveries of new parasites look harmless. When the incidence of parasite discoveries rose sharply during 2012, the street dog community argued that these parasites might come in with migrating birds or with wild fauna which had crossed the borders. This is, in our view, arguments that do not make sense. Migratory birds and animals have been around forever, but we have never found these parasites in Norway before. However, they have been found specifically on imported stray dogs in 2012. There is a long border with Sweden. It is inconceivable that the parasites should have come to Norway via animals which cross this border. Discoveries made in Sweden might also be linked to imported street dogs. Apart from the fox tapeworm no new parasites have been found in the Swedish fauna. In the north, Norway shares borders with Russia and Finland. It is also inconceivable that the infection has come to Norway through these border areas, as most of the parasite discoveries were made in dogs in southern Norway.

Climate change and new parasite species. Several parasites are transmitted by insects which today do not have satisfactory living conditions in Norway. We know too little about many of these hosts, and it may be only a matter of time before they adapt to a Norwegian climate with rising temperatures.

A warmer climate may also change the vegetation and make an adjustment easier. Before 1988 there was no Iberia Snail (Arion vulgaris) to be found in Norway. It has its origins in southern France and Spain. Now it exists in large parts of southern Norway and right up to the coast of Nordland. The Norwegian forest tick has been widely spread in recent years and is found as far north as Finnmark. Lately brown dog ticks (Riphicephalus sanguineus) were found in the sleeping areas of dogs imported to Norway a few days earlier. The discovery was made in northern Norway in winter. This tick species is present today and is not stationary in Norway. Unlike our own ticks, this species is adapted to living indoors and is very difficult to get rid of. Brown ticks use mainly dogs as host animals, but can also suck the blood of other species such as cats, rodents and birds. It is also found on people, especially if a dog is no longer present and the tick is already in the house. This tick can be a vector for a number of organisms (bacteria, parasites and viruses) which are not common in Norway. Some of these cause diseases only in dogs, while others can cause illnesses in humans as well.

There was a large infestation of ticks on humans in Romania in the spring of 2012, and it evolved into a massive problem in certain shelters as well.

” … it is said that there is already one big problem. Dogs suffer not only in shelters but also in foster homes! They say they have too little equipment and tools to be able to cope with the problem …. and they are begging us to help them now! They said the fleas are carriers of other things … and ticks breed now in the heat. ” From street dog internet pages.

Discoveries made in apparently healthy dogs. A survey conducted by the Faculty of Biology at the University of Warsaw in Poland in the period 2006 – 2008 found Babesia canis and other tick-borne diseases in apparently healthy dogs.

Sweden has had its first case of Brucella canis. It was found in a breeding dog imported from Poland which was mated with a dog imported from Serbia. This dog is possibly a carrier. The dogs tested negative when they were imported. Yet infection was present. There are efforts made in tracking the infection and it is suggested that “stray dogs in the Mediterranean area are suggested to serve as a reservoir.” The authors of the article believe that Brucellosis may be under-reported in humans.      

“Hmmm … Now I’m not sure what Brucellosis is, but this sentence makes me sure that I do not want my dog ….. tested for it:” If it turns out that the dog is infected FSA will consider further measures. ” Further action = killing.

It is quite possible that it is a disease we do not want here, but if there is talk about killing, I think you should think it over before running to the vet for testing only. “(From street dog Group June 25, 2012.)

Sticker tumor/venereal tumor in dogs. This disease is extremely rare or non-existent in Scandinavia. The cancer is one of the very few malignant tumors which can be transmitted between dogs. The tumor was discovered in 2008 in Sweden in a street dog imported from Romania. The dog was humanely euthanized.

The dog seems to be infected with sticker tumor and needs vincristine. Strange that they cannot get hold of the medicine. I know several dogs which have been treated for this in Bucharest, including my own, and then there was no problem in getting hold of the medication”. From a Group of Romanian street dogs imported into Norway, January 2013

About pet passports and microchips. Pets crossing the border into Norway must be provided with passports. It is a standard procedure for the entire EU region.

According to the EU’s decision on completing passports (CD2003 / 803) they must have a printed ISO country code and unique number on the front cover. We are aware that the NFSA sought to stop imports from the EU countries because the passports were not properly designed and completed. One of the NFSA directors was contacted directly by the European Commission with clear instructions to accept these passports, even though they are not produced or supplemented in accordance with the EU’s own legislation. This is most strange, given that Norway is not even a member of the EU, and that such instructions were passed through the ESA (EFTA Surveillance Authority). In addition to a passport all dogs must be fitted with a microchip. The chip is supposed to contain a country code and the individual’s unique number. The number should be internationally recognized by ISO. Sample chip numbers according ISO from Norway: NO 578 and the individual’s unique number. A chip number from Romania should be RO 642 and an individual number. Then why do dogs imported to Norway from Romania have country code numbers that are different from those that apply under the ISO standard? A dog passport should also contain information about valid vaccinations. Then there must be no doubt about the dog’s identity. If unknown chip numbers (other than ISO) are used there should be questions asked about the country of origin of a dog, and who has put in the chip. Therefore one can also ask whether the passport is valid. If the information in the passport is not correct, it can be questioned whether vaccinations are actually given and who has stamped the passport. We are aware that a Norwegian woman brought home a dog which had not been to the vet before leaving their country of origin. Yet the passport was stamped with valid vaccinations. At a meeting between the Authorities and representatives of a street dog Group held on 11th of June 2012 it was stated that there were no changes in the regulations relating to dog imports. NFSA still recommend that you do not import street dogs from Southern and Eastern Europe.

“One does not advertise when a Romanian dog is reassigned to another family. How could NFSA know that it has been relocated without going through the ads? …..” (From street dog group).

“… There is always a way out if you manage to get it to Norway … Who checks if it gets relocated after a while …” (From street dog group)

Continued import of dogs into Norway. That NFSA and other agencies have warned against the importation of dogs to Norway, and this is not new. NFSA already came out with warnings three years ago. Imports and adoption of street dogs in Norway continues even after the Veterinary Institute presented its risk analysis, and despite all the warnings from the scientific community. The same day as the meeting between representatives of the street dog group and NFSA was held, there were three dogs coming from Romania to Norway via Gardermoen. We have evidence that dogs are lining up to come to Norway. Daily the dogs are advertised for adoption on different Norwegian sites on the Internet. This means that my, yours and our children’s future health status is controlled by a group of street dog importers who defy all warnings from the assembled veterinary profession and the Ministry of Agriculture, and what for us seems like a somewhat ‘paralyzed’ NFSA.

“What happens to dogs which have waited so long to get a home from …shelter.” “They are coming soon” (From street dog Group June 19, 2012.)

“Hey, I need a car for the weekend so we can collect some dogs, someone who can help?” (From street dog group 21 June 2012.)

Pressure groups, smear campaigns and disclaimers. Several European countries have huge problems with stray dogs. In Romania we have seen examples of politicians who want to address this issue being subjected to petitions from both national and international pressure groups. These include those involved in shelters in Romania and importers in Norway. These pressure groups do not want street dogs to be killed, and it is legitimate to question whether there can be financial interests behind this? In Norway we see that there is a major smear campaign against the government and the NFSA in particular, in connection with the import of street dogs into the country. This happens on many facebook pages. Here NFSA is criticized for the handling of sampling of street dogs, suspension of imports because of pet passports in May 2011 and for bad information to dog owners. NFSA could possibly be criticized for poor handling of individual cases, but to criticize them for doing a job they have been assigned is unfair. To an outsider it may seem as if the smear campaign has intensified after the Veterinary Institute presented its analysis. We see that the criticism is partly unjustified, and that the cases against named individuals who are exposed are said to amount to hate speech. This is harassment and shows lack of knowledge about behaviour on the internet. To us it seems that there is a conscious effort to turn the focus away from the import and adoption, to the way officials of NFSA exercise their authority.

The import regulations distinguish between non-commercial and commercial activities. Placing dogs in foster homes before final adoption is illegal according to the non-commercial regulations. This is considered commercial activity. We have evidence that the introduction of many street dogs to Norway is done on a commercial basis. Adoption groups blame the NFSA for not responding earlier, and argue that the NFSA do not know their own regulations. However, any person has a duty to familiarize themselves with the laws and regulations that apply. Authorities disclaim responsibility, as the strongest means available to them is a recommendation to not import from Southern and Eastern Europe. Those who are behind street dog imports deny responsibility for any wrongdoing. They belittle the dangers of the parasites/diseases found during 2012, and blame the authorities by covering themselves behind the statement that the import is legal.

“I’m a foster home and have had many dogs until now. They live with me until they have been”acclimatized”.  (From street dog group)

Despite strong warnings from the collective veterinary society the import of street dogs continues. Blaming each other does not help if people or animals become infected and ill. Everyone is responsible for their own actions. The Act on food production and food safety. (Food Act) § 19 reads: “Everyone must exercise due care to avoid any risk of the development or spread of contagious animal disease. Live animals will not be sold, included in husbandry, moved or taken out when there is reason to suspect a contagious animal disease that can have significant social consequences. ”

Some statements from various street dog groups. Someone who has asked the damn hag (who certainly has not been laid recently) about WHY she personally is so horrible towards our dogs?? Has she been bitten in her ass by a dog and developed heartworm, tongue worm AND been infected with Giardia? No Miss NFSA (Very vulgar expression) get a life and stay away from us, yes actually stay away from people in general. Imagine that she might have children HEEEEELP. Hoping for God’s sake that they do not become infected by anything. Then they will be killed in COLD blood!!!

I witnessed a raid by NFSA at an eatery in Lillestrøm. If everybody is like that owl who led the raid, then God help us. She was snooping around like a mad hen, without finding anything to put your finger on. She oozed being power hungry. Ugh! And to be really nasty, the hag is probably suffering from certain power hunger due her fright of mirrors. I considered actually asking her to visit to greet the world’s most beautiful contagious bomb from Romania. :-))

I suspect all the damn NFSA-gang of having rabies. They should be shot!”

“….. Who wants full stop on these imports because …….. s scaremongering around this tongue worm …… Yet it says in all reviews that infections are VERY rare in people!!!

I blame Norway for its crazy f .. ing laws! Long live Breivik, hire him some more friends.”

NFSA is a whorehouse sorry but this kind of behaviour … now they must get a skinful from higher authorities.”

There are economic consequences if new diseases were to be established in Norway. If this business isn’t controlled or stopped, there could be major public and economic consequences. A dog owner whose dog is infected by parasites will have major veterinary expenses on sampling and medication, and presumably there will be insurance premium increases. We have a long border with Sweden, and many Norwegians travel across the border both to second homes and for holidays. If we get rabies in Norway or Sweden, all dog owners would have to innoculate their dogs against rabies. An infection control program against rabies will cost the Norwegian society both money and human resources.

For a farmer who receives a transmittable disease into the herd, the entire livelihood may be threatened. Brucellosis causes abortion, infertility and decreased milk production in animals. In humans it may cause serious disease which is hard to cure. In Norway the whole herd will be slaughtered. For producers of vegetables, fruits and berries who have crops contaminated with manure containing pathogens, the consequences will be severe. They may have to disinfect the farm and let fields lie fallow for several years because of infection. We may experience the pollution of water, which will affect many. The cost of fighting the fox tapeworm will amount to large sums of money if this parasite is established in Norway. Another major cost will be tracking disease outbreaks and vaccination programs. The Norwegian veterinary authorities are now doing a study of street dogs from Romania; there is a cost which the community carries through sampling and additional use of human resources.

A well-documented study requires that the involved parties participate. We know that many owners of imported stray dogs do not want this. They are afraid that their dogs will be euthanized if dangerous diseases are discovered.


On multi-resistant bacteria, the problem is so great in some places in Europe that people who are involved with livestock must be examined for the presence of MRSA before they can be hospitalised. It takes time to get the results of the tests, and it can be a problem in acute admissions. If we have an outbreak of bacterial disease resistant to antibiotics, it may lead to a more difficult treatment. If no medication works the disease can be fatal.

In Sweden Brucella canis was found in a breeding dog. The result was the loss of the dog, the loss of future litters, and loss of income. The other dogs had to be isolated. The same was true for other dogs which had been in contact with the dog breeder. Many people were affected even if only one dog was sick. Parasites, bacteria or viruses do not distinguish who becomes infected. Not all pathogens are dangerous for everyone, but what may not be dangerous for a healthy person can be life threatening for another. A healthy person can be a carrier of bacteria without being sick, and transmit the bacteria to susceptible people. Many Norwegians live with compromised immune systems due to an underlying disease. It can be both a human and an economic burden to be hit by an additional disease due to infection from new pathogens.

“The vet……. wrote: Veterinarians are most susceptible when it comes to dogs from the shelter, we come in contact with many dogs and many diseases. I answered: What about doctors, they are in contact with lots of people and many diseases, some of which are infectious and serious too. Many asylum seekers who come to the doctor can be the carriers of dangerous diseases that we do not have in Norway. However, they will not be denied medical care because of it. That vet is not quite good in the head, hey “(From street dog group).

Can public health become compromised? It seems that very little money has been allocated to public health in relation to pets. Society is spending huge sums to have an overview of the clinical picture of farmed animals and fish. However, money has never been used to establish which diseases we actually may find in pets. There is little knowledge of the zoonotic situation in small animals, beyond reporting by some pet veterinarians. Autopsies are relatively rare on dogs, and it is usually the owner or the insurance company who pays. The EU has introduced zoonotic surveillance in connection with food contamination. This should also apply to pets, particularly as the import of stray dogs from Eastern and Southern Europe has increased significantly and because of the findings made in street dogs. It is also worrying that no risk analysis has been done since the NFSA was established in 2004. We believe there is every reason to be concerned about the current and future public health situation in Norway.

Importing new species to Norway is not a crime, but it may be harmful to the environment. The government is responsible for animal and public health in Norway. One of the NFSA tasks is to combat disease in animals and prevent the introduction of new species of parasite, virus and bacteria to Norway. How could they implement this on the basis of the prevailing regulations? Iceland, like Norway, is also an EEA country. They have managed to some extent to keep their strict regime for the import of animals. Are we no longer “our own masters”? We are blessed with good animal health, which we want to keep. To import a street dog with unknown health background is not illegal under current regulations. However, there has been no lack of warnings from authorities. The importers of these dogs must not complain years later, when the infections are a fact, and say that “we were not warned” or that “we did not do anything illegal”. One is allowed to use one’s head and show responsibility. Everything that is legal is not necessarily wise! The warnings from the scientific community against these imports are picked apart by the street dog people in order to fit the importers’ own interests. What do these people know which the scientists do not?


The different animal diseases are graded by NFSA in risk categories from A to D in order of severity, where A is the most serious. Several of the zoonoses we have described are classified into groups A and B.

It is not the Norwegian government’s responsibility how other EU countries safeguard their own welfare, but they are expected to take the necessary steps to protect both animals and humans in Norway from an increased infection threat. One measure could be to reintroduce quarantine laws. Today some of the people that adopt Romanian dogs take “shortcuts” and re-register the dogs in other countries on the way to Norway to camouflage their origin. We know that this has happened, and it shows once again the need for more stringent regulations.

We do not want a reduced quality of life due to illness caused by the importation of parasites and other disease pathogens. We do not want the extra burden society will have if children are affected. We want to walk safely in the forest which is part of our culture, eating berries and fruits without the risk of getting sick, we want safe food on the table, drink clean water, we want healthy animals and we want our children to grow up in a safe environment with the same opportunities that their parents and grandparents had. There are millions of street dogs in Europe. As long as there is an offer, there will also be a demand. The discovery of parasites like ticks, fleas and mange in the recent past shows that control programs in countries where dogs have their origins are not good enough or absent, and that we cannot rely on the veterinary paperwork that comes with the dogs. This is serious, and there will be a continuing issue that the government must deal with the prevailing regulations.

Zoonoses are fought primarily by breaking the transmission chain. Climate change makes it easier for alien insects and new parasites to become established in Norway. We must have a regulatory framework that safeguards us and the next generation in our everyday lives. This issue is urgent! Imports of street dogs of unknown disease background from southern and Eastern Europe have increased sharply since the recent legislation came into force on 01.01.12. It is worrying that this coincides with border controls becoming less despite all the warnings from scientific communities. From 2004, NFSA had a 24-hour system of rapid emergency response but this was unfortunately closed down from 01.01.2010. The customs officers could turn to State veterinarians in cases where knowledge of disease and animal welfare legislation was needed. Then problems around imports of pets and possible disease could be resolved immediately. There is a great need to have the larger border posts re-manned by border control veterinarians who can check incoming ferries and non-domestic aircraft.


That it is so easy to introduce dogs to Norway and that this has been taken so far was not the intention behind the “pet Regulation” at the time when it was adopted. If the situation continues, Norway will sooner or later experience new and unwanted diseases entering the country. It is only a matter of time. We have many in the scientific community who agree that the movement of live animals across borders must be regulated in a stricter way than is the case today. In addition, the NFSA and the Customs Service should have increased allocations to step up border controls.

The legislation in Norway today does not maintain animal and public health in a satisfactory manner.

Is it really possible to make an issue out of something like this? God, maybe it is simply true that kids do not get a proper upbringing anymore? Germs? Who the hell cares about germs when one is three? I often take the dog into a kindergarten. They have put up a sign now, “Please walk your dog somewhere else, for the sake of the children.” For the sake of the children? There aren’t any kids there after closing. So how in the world would it be inconvenient for kids? I understand the argument with shitting and peeing, but I make sure she is done before we go into the kindergarten. So what’s the problem? “(From Child and Parent AP / Debate)

Been waiting for this, and today it happened: An ancient dragon threw herself at me because I walk the dogs in the cemetery. Dragon: What, walk the dogs in the cemetery? It is not permitted. I: It’s allowed, read the poster at the entrance. Complain to Oslo Municipality if it bothers you. Bitch: What, the dogs shall pee on the graves? It’s absolutely disrespectful, I: My dogs are doing nothing wrong, and they’re allowed to be here. Troll: Oh, what would you have said if a mongrel peed on your grave when you were dead? I: That’s what I thought would be great, life goes on. I found it best to pull away at the time, and heard the horror owl shouted something about “education” after me. My consolation is that this old bitch soon will end up in the grave, and worms which will enjoy themselves on her decomposing corpse are hardly going to show any respect. “(From street dog environment)

Links to warnings from doctors and veterinarians C3% B8veforelsning_til_PhD.pdf


http://www / nkk / public / open reservation? ARTICLE_ID = 14057 -from-import dog

Other links to this topic: 20brer% 20seg.html ? id = 613868 http://www.mast .is / Uploads / document / eydubl_ensk / ChecklistIportationofdogsandcatstoiceland.pdf

We want to thank the veterinarians and other professionals who have answered questions and helped us along the way. All quotations are documented, but for privacy reasons we do not want to use names.

Oslo, 25th of June 2012


Austria, 2012. Horror with 30 Kittens in a House of a Hoarder


Animal hoarding is a complex and intricate issue with far-reaching effects that encompass mental health, animal welfare and public safety concerns.

It has been estimated that there are 900 to 2,000 new cases every year in the United States, with a quarter million animals falling victim. Those “collected” range in species from cats and dogs to reptiles, rodents, birds, exotics and even farm animals.

Why Do People Hoard Animals?

It is not clearly understood why people become animal hoarders. Early research pointed toward a variant of obsessive-compulsive disorders, but new studies and theories are leading toward attachment disorders in conjunction with personality disorders, paranoia, delusional thinking, depression and other mental illnesses. Some animal hoarders began collecting after a traumatic event or loss, while others see themselves as “rescuers” who save animals from lives on the street.

“Historically, a person who collected animals was viewed as an animal lover who got in over his or her head, but the truth is that people who hoard are experiencing a total loss of insight,” says Dr. Randall Lockwood, ASPCA Senior Vice President, Forensic Sciences and Anti-cruelty Projects. “They have no real perception of the harm they’re doing to the animals.”

Video : Confession of Hoarders ( dogs and cats )

Click to see the Video :

Animal Hoarder

A Case, Austria, 2012.
In a House ( city of Hainburg )  30 cats were found living in a horror conditions of life

Pictures :

Shelter directors with imagination. No experience necessary


Shelter directors with imagination. No experience necessary.

What are important characteristics of an effective animal shelter director? A love of animals? A passion for saving lives? Someone who demands excellence? Yes, yes, and yes. They must also be hard working, effective, determined, willing to take risks, solution oriented, accountable, someone who leads by example, and someone who can do a lot of things with limited resources. I’ve heard a No Kill shelter director quip that a good leader is someone with “the ability to hide their panic”—to appear in control even in the face of the chaos swirling around you.

In the end, all of these characteristics are important. And they include everything you want in a leader. They include everything you and the animals in your community deserve and have a right to expect from someone running your animal shelter—the shelter that is supposed to reflect your values, paid for with your tax and philanthropic dollars.

But I would argue that the most important factor, the one that trumps all the others, the one that determines whether the shelter director—and therefore the No Kill mission—succeeds or fails in a particular community is imagination.

When I left San Francisco to take over an open admission animal control shelter in upstate New York, I wasn’t sure what I was in for. My experience was limited to the San Francisco SPCA, sitting on the Board of Directors for a No Kill humane society in Palo Alto, and rescue. I talked to shelters in other communities and I believed in the model created in San Francisco, but as to how long it would take to end the killing at an animal control shelter? I wasn’t sure. But I also knew that I had to try.

And now that the way has been paved, now that we know the answer is “overnight,” the time is ripe for wholesale regime change. Because today, roughly 3,000 or so “shelter” directors refuse to comprehensively implement the No Kill Equation. They are killing in the face of readily available lifesaving alternatives. And, in so doing, they are holding back the will of millions of Americans who love animals and want to see their needless killing come to an end.
Read more :

Nathan J. Winograd is a graduate of Stanford Law School, a former criminal prosecutor and corporate attorney, has spoken nationally and internationally on animal sheltering issues, has written animal protection legislation at the state and national level, has created successful No Kill programs in both urban and rural communities, and has consulted with a wide range of animal protection groups including some of the largest and best known in the nation.


When animal lovers learn about the tragic reality of cruelty and killing that is endemic at our nation’s “shelters,” and that the national organizations such as the Humane Society of the United States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and the ASPCA defend the killing and thwart reform efforts, the first—and the most logical—question that inevitably follows is: Why?

Why would organizations which were supposed to have been founded on the highest ideals of compassion become the biggest defenders of the animal abuse and killing which occurs daily in our nation’s so-called “shelters”? Exploring the historical, psychological and financial motivations behind the unlikely support these shelters receive from HSUS, the ASPCA and PETA, among others, Friendly Fire answers this often confounding question while telling the stories of animals who have become catalysts for change: Oreo, Ace, Patrick, Kapone, Hope, Scruffy, Jeri & Murray, and others.
Read more :

Browse > Home / Blog Posts, The Truth About HSUS / Betrayal & Deceit at the Humane Society of the United States

Betrayal & Deceit at the Humane Society of the United States

The fundraising appeal from John Goodwin of the Humane Society of the United States was ambitious. The goal was to raise one million dollars by month’s end for dogs like “Faye,” an abused fighting dog rescued in the largest bust of a dog fighting ring in U.S. history. According to Goodwin, “Faye” is now safe, in a loving home, recovering thanks to HSUS.
But none of it was true: the fundraising appeal was deliberately designed to mislead donors. HSUS was not involved in caring for “Faye.” HSUS, in fact, predicted and suggested that dogs like “Faye” should be killed. In further fact, they could not even get her name right. And while Fay was being cared for, and needed surgery, the costs and care were being provided by someone else.

by Nathan J. Winograd



Browse > Home / Blog Posts, The Truth About PETA / The Butcher of Norfolk (6th Edition)

The Butcher of Norfolk (6th Edition)

February 23, 2012 by

Slaughterhouse: slaugh·ter·house (slôtr-hous): n. A place where animals are butchered.

The numbers are in. In 2011, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) impounded 760 dogs. They killed 713 of them. Only 19 were adopted. An additional 36 of them were transferred to kill “shelters” where their fates and the fates of those animals they displaced are unknown. In 2011, they impounded 1,211 cats. 1,198 were put to death. A paltry 5 of them were adopted and another 8 were transferred to kill “shelters” where their fates and the fates of those animals they displaced are unknown. They also took in 58 other companion animals, including rabbits. 54 were put to death. Only 4 were adopted. All told, 2,029 companion animals were impounded. 1,965 were put to death. Only 28 were placed in homes.

That’s a 97% rate of killing. If the animals transferred to kill shelters were themselves killed or displaced other animals who were then killed to take in the ones from PETA, the death toll could be as high as 99% (2,009 of the 2,029 animals they impounded). Only 1% were adopted into homes. While the No Kill movement is having unparalleled success and with No Kill communities now dotting the American landscape—in California, Nevada, Michigan, Kentucky, New York, Texas, Virginia, and elsewhere—PETA continues to be little more than a slaughterhouse.

[This is the sixth time I’ve posted this blog.]

The blog I write is about reforming animal sheltering in the United States. It is about ending the systematic killing of animals in these pounds. But this particular blog isn’t about sheltering. This isn’t about the battle between the No Kill philosophy and its eventual conquest over regressive, kill-oriented approaches. This isn’t about a lazy, inept, or uncaring shelter director who fails to hold his or her staff accountable. It isn’t about shelters that kill animals because doing so is easier than putting in place the programs and services to stop it.


Animal Testing – numbers and facts


Animal testing,also known as animal experimentation, animal research, and in vivo testing, is the use of non-human animals in experiments.

Millions are killed yearly and not a single one of these animal tests has ever been formally proved to be relevant to or able to accurately predict human health effects.


Pesticides must be tested on dogs, who are shoved into “inhalation chambers” where they try in vain to escape the deadly poisons that are pumped in.


Animals used by laboratories are largely supplied by specialist dealers.

Sources differ for vertebrate and invertebrate animals. Most laboratories breed and raise flies and worms themselves, using strains and mutants supplied from a few main stock centers.

For vertebrates, sources include :

*breeders who supply purpose-bred animals;

*businesses that trade in  animals;

*dealers who supply animals sourced from pounds, auctions, and
newspaper /web ads.

100 million animals yearly worldwide

Worldwide it is estimated that the number of vertebrate animals—from zebrafish to non-human primates—ranges from the tens of millions to more than 100 million used annually.

115 million animals are used in laboratory experiments around the world each year – animal experimentation is an industry without borders.

Sources of laboratory animals vary between countries and species; most animals are purpose-bred, while others are caught in the wild or supplied by dealers who obtain them from auctions and pounds.


The research is conducted inside universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, farms, defense establishments, and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry.

It includes pure research such as
academic, university research
pharmaceutical, new drugs are tested on animals
developmental biology,
behavioral studies,
biomedical research,
behavioral research,
drug testing ,
toxicology tests,
cosmetics testing.
Animals are also used for education, breeding, and defense research.

Research is usually carried out in the pharmaceutical industry, or by universities in commercial partnerships.

The practice is regulated to various degrees in different countries.


The United States military has a long history of conducting cruel animal experiments.

Each year, approximately 342,000 primates, dogs, pigs, goats, sheep, rabbits, cats, and other animals are hurt and killed by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) in experiments that rank among the most painful conducted in this country. The cost to taxpayers for these military experiments is estimated to be in excess of $225 million annually.

Top Secret

Military testing is classified “top secret,” and it is very hard to get information about it.

From published research, we do know that armed forces facilities all over the United States test all manner of weaponry on animals, from Soviet AK-47 rifles to biological and chemical warfare agents to nuclear blasts.

—- beagles were exposed to total-body irradiation, studied for one to seven days, and then killed. The experimenter concluded that radiation affects the gallbladder————

Wound Labs

The Department of Defense has operated “wound labs” since 1957 to train medics and soldiers in how to treat traumatic injuries.
At these sites, animals―who are sometimes conscious or semiconscious―are suspended from slings and shot with high-powered weapons to inflict battle-like injuries for military surgical practice.

In 1983, in response to public pressure, Congress limited the use of dogs and cats in these training exercises. PETA is now demanding that the military stop shooting, burning, mutilating, poisoning, and killing thousands of goats, pigs, and monkeys in similar exercises every year.

In 2006, a Navy corpsman told The New York Times that instructors “shot [his pig] twice in the face with a 9-millimeter pistol, and then six times with an AK-47 and then twice with a 12-gauge shotgun. And then he was set on fire.”

In 2008, the San Antonio Express-News described a trauma course in which 990 living goats had their legs broken and amputated: “Instructor Armand Fermin places a tree trimmer over a joint in the leg, closes it, applies pressure and a ‘crack’ echoes inside the dimly lit tent at Fort Sam Houston.”

Internal military documents obtained by PETA through Freedom of Information Act requests show that monkeys were exposed to chemical-weapon nerve-agent stimulants, after which an Army medic compared his monkey’s apparently painful reaction during the exercise to “a chiwawa [sic] shitting razor blades.”


The idea that animals might not feel pain as human beings feel it traces back to the 17th-century French philosopher, René Descartes, who argued that animals do not experience pain and suffering because they lack consciousness.


Animal Testing occurs regularly throughout the European Union (EU). While it occurs more frequently in areas such as the United Kingdom (UK), France and Germany, animal testing still plays a large role in research and drug development around Europe.

European Statistics for Animal Testing

European statistics showed that

France used 2.3 million animals in 2005

Germany used 1.8 million animals in that same year

UK statistics showed that

France used 2.3 million animals!

Germany used 2.4 million animals!

While Finland and Ireland both decreased their use of animals.

Sweden, Spain and Greece all increased their use of animals, either doubling or near-doubling their use.


Each year in the United States, an estimated 70 million animals are maimed, blinded, scalded, force-fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, and otherwise hurt and killed in the name of science, by private institutions, household product and cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centers.

Substances we use everyday, such as eye shadow, soap, furniture polish and oven cleaner, may be tested on rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, dogs, cats, and other animals.

These tests are mainly used to test the degree of harmfulness of products and their ingredients. No antidoes are ever sought, so animal tests cannot be used to prevent or treat potential human injuries.

Nastavi čitati

Slovenija, 2002. Sekvestrirano 300 pasa.

Milena Močivnik,slovenska  spasiteljica napuštenih pasa 1994-2002.

Priča o Mileni Močivnik iz Dola kod Borovnice u Sloveniji je biblijskih razmjera. Priča o dobru i zlu u par koraka.
O ljubavi mase prema jednoj ženi i linču koji je nastupio pokrenut interesima.

O spektakularnoj akciji policije kojom je Mileni oduzeto 300 pasa i  prebačeno za udomljavanje za Austriju i Njemačku!

O sukobu zaštitarskog mentaliteta žene koja je voljela životnje i tehničkoj logici da životinje treba
selektirati, čipirati, sterilizirati i deportirati.

Priča sadrži elemente od zanosa do prijetnji, provale u kući, optužbe za trgovinu drogom,cjeniku mefijaških prijetnji unutar zaštitarskih krugova,  pohlepi i zanosu, o knjizi o Mileni u kojoj su akteri nazvani “ledenim ubojicom”, “gnojnim čirom”, a Milena kao ljudska žrtva u gomili interesa…

Pročitajte priču o Mileni


Milenu su štovali za sveticu, majku svih pasa, prvu zaštitnicu životinja u Sloveniji.
Milenu  su svečano primali predsjednici Slovenije.
Odlikovana je kao Slovenka godine i tako sve dok  na dan 19. oktobra 2002. , organiziranom akcije policije i veterinata, a nakon deset godina njezinog aktivnog bavljenja napuštenim psima, se upalo na njeno imanje i usprkos njenom protivljenju  došlo je do sekvestracije  300 pasa i mačaka .

Spektakularna akcija stresla je slovensku javnost.
Milenine pristaše sukobile su se sa predsjednicom njemačko austrijske organizacije za zaštitu životnja Tierhilfe Suden i članicama koje su prisustvovale oduzima pasa.

Policija ih je razdvajala…. Došlo je do teških riječi , vukli su pse po dvorištu i utovarivali u tovarne kamione, kasnije su očevici pričali da su neki psi pritom ozlijeđeni ali su Tierhilfe Suden to demantirali i rekli da je pas bio sediran…

A kako je do svega toga došlo?

Još par mjeseci prije toga Milena je u svom azilu držala  otvorene dane , ljudi su kod nje udomljavali ili ostavljali pse, a sve je to snimala medijska javnost i objavljivala fotografije nasmiješenih Slovenaca i psića u naručju koji su hvalili Milenu…


POVIJEST MILENINOG UZDIZANJA! Od  prijestolja do rušenja u  blato

Milenu su mediji naprosto obožavali. SVI  su je hvalili. Predsjednik Kučan je o njoj imao divno mišljenje.
Milena je postala slovenska heroina. 1993. proglasili su je Slovenkom godine radi iznimne humanosti.

Ona je voljela životinje , željela samo to raditi u životu, skrbiti se za napuštene , mediji su o njoj pisali jednom nakon što su je otkrili  i tako je sve veći broj ljudi dovozio Mileni napuštene životinje koje su nalazili po Sloveniji.

Nije ona bila osoba koja je zvala medije, mediji su išli za njom. Bila je medijska zvijezda, osoba koja se žrtvuje za opće dobro, kolektivna savjest Slovenije u odnosu na napuštene životinje kojih je bilo sve više,a azila još nije bilo.

Milenu su obožavali su i tadašnji začetci   slovenske zaštitarske scene  koji su iza Milene gradili bolju budućnost za napuštene životinje Slovenije, a poneki i svoju buduću karijeru.

Već od malena Milena je bila drugačija. Imala je 6 godina kada je znala premotati krilo ranjenoj ptici.
Pričala da se želi baviti životinjama.
Kao odrasla osoba ona je cjelovito, uložila sebe potpuno, svoju  samopožrtvovnosti i ljubav u odluci da  pomaže napuštenim životinjama tako da je to postepeno  snažno ugrozilo osjećaj dobrostanja kolektivne slovenske zaštitarske scene ( a i šire )


Ljudi koji su Milenu  najviše hvalili, najprije su joj se približili, odlučili pomagati, otvarali žiro račune za pomoć Mileni te pozivali narod na podršku, a potom kada se novac počeo slijevati postali su Milenini najveći oponenti, pokretači lavine

Meta Malus, astrologinja koja se nakon par godina oštro krenula protiv Milene pisala je da bi trebalo još puno tako humanih ljudi na svijetu poput Milene…

Hvalio ju je i Roman Turšek iz Društva protiv mučenja životinja Trbovlje koji je kasnije također postao jedan od njezinih najvećih oponenata.  Tada je pisao u zanosu od ženi kojoj je veliko srce i koja sa lakoćom hrani 150 životinja i za sve njih se brine sa puno ljubavi i brige.

Pisali su o Maksu, vučjaku kojeg je bezdušni vlasnik izbacio iz jurećeg automobila i oštetio mu kralješnicu, a Milena ga uzela u naručje i umirivala dok su ga liječili…

Prvo negativno pismo protiv Milene odaslano je 1994. iz Društva za zaštitu životinje, Ljubljana.  U pismu su glavni i odgovorni obrazložili prekid suradnje sa Milenom jer “nije htjela udomljavati pse”

Pustimo sa strane ispravnost činjenica da je Milena sigurno imala dobre razloge da prvo dobro razmisli prije nego nekome da psa i usredotočimo se koji su glavni razlozi za seriju napada na Milenu!

Milena je postepeno dobila gotovo 300 životinja.
Ona nije imala ni volje ni potrebe da iz toga radi posao. Ona je to radila iz čiste ljubavi i osjećaja da želi životinjama pomagati.
Toliki broj životinja kod Milene bio je društvena posljedica napuštanja životinja o kojima se nitko od strane društvene zajednice Slovenije nije skrbio na pravi način. Milena je imala društvenu podršku za svoje djelovanje.
Ali samo podršku.

Ona nije imala ni poduzeća, ni udruge, ni žiro računa, ni bankovnog računa,a pasa je bilo sve više jer iz cijele su joj Slovenije dovozili pse .
Tako je Udruženje za pomoć psima iz Ljubljane, a kada je Milena postala zvijezda, pokrenulo opće društvenu akciju  prikupljanja financijskih sredstava i hrane za Milenine pse.

Milena je bila prostodušna žena ali je ubrzo shvatila da novac ne dolazi pasima nego nestaje putem te se zahvalila na suradnji i zatvorila Društvu DPMŽ LJubljana vrata.
I tu ja započeo početak Mileninog kraja.

Njezina prostodušnost i životna želja da pomaže je oštro odudarala od poduzetnosti određenih interesnih krugova.

Uz Društvo DPMŽ Ljubljana , novčane priloge za Milenine pse se počelo sakupljati i preko poduzeća kojeg su za tu namjenu ustanovile “astrologinja” Meta Malus i Jana Turk, poduzetnica koje su do tada silno  hvalile Milenu.

No i ovdje nije štimalo sa parama.

Tako se i njima  Milena u augustu, 1984. zahvalila na suradnji i to je bio sudbonosni početak kraja Milene kao heroine
i početak Milene kao “luđakinje”


Za sve to vrijeme Milena se požrtvovno brinula za oko 300 životinja. Pričalo se da je protiv sterilizacije, protiv uspavljivanja bolesnih pasa, da ona sjedi do njih dok ne umru prirodnom smrti, njezina je ljubav prema njima bila narodska, izvorna , bez pouke o čipovanju, sterilizaciji ….

Na vijest da se preselila na novu lokaciju , da je kupila kuću,  u časopisu u kojem su je do  hvalili,a koji je uređivala Meta Malus, žena sa kojom je Milena prekinula suradnju , otvoren je napad . Objavili su da Milena otvara bordel te da će u kući trgovati drogom.

Milena je , po nalogu Inspekcije, morala iseliti i pse i odselila se na imanje , na napušteni teren kraj Celja.
Dok je praznila posjed, nepoznat joj je netko ubio par pasa. Provaljeno joj je u kuću, razbijen inventar….

U to vrijeme je Roman Turnšek, još uvijek u u svojoj kolumni pisao da su glasine protiv Milene krenule u trenutku kada su se “poduzetnice” sudarile sa Mileninim potenim i dosljednim karakterom. No, nije dugo trajala ni njegova podrška.

Već za mjesec dana i Turnšek se okrenuo protiv Milene objavivši da je njegovoj suradnji sa njom konac!

Turnšek koji je još par mjeseci nakon prekida suradnje sa Milenom sakupljao novčane donacije pod nazivom :”Za tužne oči pasa sa Visokog!” pridružio se ekipi za linč.
Sam je priznao da su preko žiro računa Trbovlje , a od strane građana, sakupili jako puno novaca za Milenu i njene pse jer su joj ljudi vjerovali!.
Odjednom je postao gromoglasan :” Ona nikome ne želi davati pse! Nitko za nju nije dobar udomitelj!”
Napao ju je da nema legalan azil, da je to mučionica, prljava i zanemarena, da ne zna sa životinjama, ni sa novcem osim kada je njoj u korist.

Za Intervju u 1995. je izjavio da Mileni nije davao novce jer mu ona nije ispostavljala račune, da je sakupio ogroman iznos za Milenine pse, da je nastavio sakupljati sredstva premda njegovo Društvo godinama nije više bilo registrirano.

Meta Malus, Jana Turk, Matjaž Urleb, Mateja Lindič in Roman Turnšek so postali zagrizeni borci protiv Milene. Na novinarskim stolovima u najrazličitijim časopisnim redakcijama je bilo na tone materijala protiv Milene . Posebno tragično tragično novinarsku vlogu je odigrala Alma Lorenz koja je napisala da pse treba Mileni oduzeti :”Bez milosti!

Tako se i dogodilo!

Link :

Otprilike SE u isto vrijeme u cijelu priču oko Milene uključuje i njemačko-austrijska organizacija za zaštitu životinja “Tierhilfe Suden!”

Odlučili su joj pomoći. Financijski te organizacijski.
Krenulo je istom putanjom, najprije su nahvalili Milenu kao osobu sa najboljim azilom u ovom dijelu Europe. Hvalili su njezinu požrtvovnost.

Milena je postepeno pristajala na njihove prijedloge. o obveznom mikročipiranju svih pasa, sterilizacije ženki ali kad je bila riječ o kastraciji mužjaka suprostavila se. I klasika : da ne želi udomljavati pse!

Sudenhilfe ne navodno uložio oko 30 000 Eur u njezin azil i htio je kontrolu. Milena se opirala.

U to je vrijeme ( april, 2002. , Milena je iza sebe već imala 8 godina karijere u skrbi sa psima! Osam godina opće društvene pomoći !) ministar slovenske Vlade  Franci But imenovao poseban odbor, koji je trebao riješiti tekuće probleme u azilu Milene Močivnik.

Odbor su činili slijedeći članovi :

  •  Irena Megušar – Savjetnica Vlade  R Slovenije,
    Anej Sam
    – slobodnii novinar i autor mnogih knjiga, između ostalih i knjige o Mileni koju je objavio nakon akcije sekvestracije 300 pasa gdje je oštro osudio učešće brojnih potikača linča protiv Milene
    mag. Primož Šterbenc– asistent na FDV.Radi želje da se odnos između Tierhilfe Suden i Mielene pobošlja Odbor je odlučio sudjelovati sa Tierhilfe Suden, njemačko austrijskom organizacijom.Nadzorni odbor je trebao pokrivati dio UDOMLJAVANJA pasa u ruke novih vlasnika te za opće uvjete bivanja i hrane u azilu .Tierhilfe Suden će nastaviti financirati Projekt u suradnji sa Veterinarskim fakultetom Ljubljana koji će ispostavljati račune. Sve je to bilo koordinirano na visokoj razini Vlade R Slovenije.

    • Kontaktna oseba nadzor odbora je bila Irena Megušar, el mail: pri Vladi R Slovenije


Njemačko austrijska Organizacije Tierhilfe Suden sudjelovala je VURSu , dirketor Zoran Kovač da se psi moraju oduzeti, a da se Mileni može ev. ostaviti limitiran broj pasa, do 5 pasa.
Dva člana Nadzornog Odbora su bila protiv takve Odluke ali ništa to više nije moglo zaustaviti.

Sugerirali su da je  Milena hordašica, psihički bolesna osoba koja ne može dobro skrbiti za sve te pse.

I odlučeno je ! Psi će se Mileni oduzeti i razmjestiti na drugim lokacijama!

U oktobru, 2002 u rano jutro pokrenuta je spektakularna akcija.

U akciji je sudjelovala Veterinarska Uprava R Slovenije, jake snage policije , njemačko austrijska organizacija Tierhilfe Suden , članovi njemačke austrijske organizacije koji su doputovali u Sloveniji da na licu mjesta promatraju oduzim pasa od Milene.

Tijekom akcije došlo je do  incidenta, kada je Primož Šterbenc, asistent na FDV , član Nadzonog Odoba za kontrolu azila Milene i  član Mirovnog  inštituta, fizički napao  predsjednicu “Tierhilfe Süden za Austriju,  Birgit Reuter, tako da je morala posredovati policija.

Strasti su se razbuktale, kako je iz razvoja kasnijih događanja bilo razvidno , članovi Nadzornog Odbora ( dvoje od troje) su bili na strani Milene ali ništa nije moglo zaustaviti to što se dogodilo uz suglasnot Vlade Republike Slovenije,a na sugestiju njemačko-austrijskog Udruženje Tierhilfe Suden.

Azil je ispražnjen od svih pasa, a Mileni su ostavili njih 5¨!!!

Svi psi su odvedeni na novu lokaciju

Uzalud su ljudi protestirali ispred azila. Psi su ukrcani na kamion i odvedeni, Kako psi, tako i mačke i ostale životinje. Bilo je sve zajedno oko 320 životinja na tom jednom mjestu.
Ubacivali su sve na jedan kamion, socijalizirane i nesocijalizirane pse, bolesne i zdrave, mužjake alfe i agresivne ženke; sve ono što su Mileni predbacivali ponovilo se tijekom oduzimanja pasa, svjedočili su očevidnici.

Postavilo se pitanje što od svega toga ima VURS? Zašto ih je odjednom zasmetala ta navodna Milenina nekooperativnost?
O kakvim je veterinarskim poslovima i interesima interesnih skupina tu bila riječ?

Možda se odgovor krio u činjenici da su pse odvezli, postepeno za Austriju i Njemačku,a neki i za Čehoslovačku?

Svakako će biti teško bilo što dokazati

Pitali su se čemu prisustvo aktivistica iz njemačko austrijske organizacije koje su doputovale da svjedoče događaju….Puno je bilo pitanja,a li psi su oduzeti i odveženi na razne lokacije s ciljem da se sve bolesne, nesocijalizirane i agresivne eutanazira,a ostalima nađe udomitelj .


I tu je bio kraj Milene , koju su svi na početku hvalili kao najbolji azil na tom području Europe. Pa tako i Tierhilfe Suden koji su uz “astrologinju” Metu Malus i ostale financijske stjenice koji su za Milenu prikupljali sredstva odlučili Milenin pad.

Za neke ljude Milena je bila primjer plemenite i osvještene osobe. Za druge je  bila problematična osoba, bolesna hordašica ili su pričali da su joj psi  krinka za kriminalne aktivnosti!

I onda odjednom kao da je nikada nije bilo.


No zaboraviti na Milenu Močivnik je bilo nemoguće.


  1. Anej Sam, član Nadzornog Odoba za pomoć azilu Milena  je po akciji sekvestracije pasa sakupio svu dokumentaciju i napisao knjigu o Mileni koja je poput krimića.

Svjedoči oštro protiv ljudi koji su doprinjeli Mileninom padu.
Definirao ih je stjenicama , ledenim ubojicama, gnojnim čirevima, iemnom i prezimenom prozvao za rušenje Milene. Postavio niz pitanja.
Prozvao prva transporte napuštenim životinjama iz Bosne i Hrvatske put Austrije i Njemačke,a  bila je riječ o 2002-2003 godini…

Knjiga koju valja pročitati!

Na sva ta pitanja i oštre kritike prozvani nisu nikada odgovorili niti uložili kazneni prijedlog protiv autora knjige o Mileni, protiv Anej Sama.

Knjiga je u javnosti digla veliku buru, prozivao se direktor Vursa Zoran Kovač protiv koga je malo potom dignuto par kaznenih prijava koje se godinama vukle po sudu po skroz drugim temama, a redatelji i prvi kritičari Milene su nestali sa scene.

Medije je odjednom pokrio val šutnje. Mediji koji su prije hvalili Milenu, pa kritizirali Milenu su odjednom zašutjeli! Dobili su nalog?

Ljudi su rogoborili danima ispred Mileninog azila ali se postepeno razišli.

Sve je pokrila tišina.

Jedina dobra stvar jest da su se nakon toga po Sloveniji postepeno počeli otvarati službeni azili za smještaj i skrb o napušteniom životinjama.

A Milena ?

Milena je preživjela par teških operacija, pobijedila samu sebe, svoje srce. Preživjela je i teški zahvat na srcu.

Danas je Milena aktivna, radi 16 h na dan, očo i lice su joj živi i puni energije. Skrbi o desetak napuštenih životinja, sama, daleko od slave medija i podrške “političkih ” i inozemnih struktura.

Milena je ostala dosljedna sebi – u sukobu sa silama interesnih skupina Milena je izgubila bitku ali je ostala dosljedna sebi.

A to je najvažnije, zar ne?


Epilog :

Spektakularna akcija tadašnjeg direktora VURSa  Zorana Kovača (dan po akciji je bio proglašen junakom tjedna po ozboru radjskih slušatelja Val 202  ) je financijska konstrukcija oduzimanja pasa i njihove opskrbe, podjela plijena, izjave “pobjdenika” po akciji…ponudili su autoru knjige o Mileni, Anej samu dodatnu argumentaciju za poznata stajališta da je Milena -pozitivan lik, visoko moralna osoba a da su njzini protivnici nehumane osobe, potpuno neljudski pojedinci je šokiralo javnost

Iz knjige je kroz dokumentaciju jasno da su svi Milenini kritičari i napadači bili prethodno osobe koje su za Milenu sakupljale donacije, hranu i novac za pse

ALI da taj novac nisu stavljali na njen račun nego na svoj odnosno u svoje trgovine sa hranom za životinje

Kada je Milena ustanovila da njeni psi od tih donacija nemaju niošta ili nešto “simbolično” je “pomačaima ” otkazala sudjelovanje
I od njih si napravila velike neprijatelje

Iz knjige Milena je jasno da je novac taj jedini faktor koji je ujedinio Malusovo, Turnška, Urleba … Svi su oni imali ta neka svoja “Udruženja za zaštitu životinja ” iako su to bile tek formalna sjedišta, adresa i ništa više od toga ,a javnost je mislila da je riječ o azilima i znali su da ako rastrgnu Milenu Močivnik da će novac koji je bio namijenje njoj stići njima na račun

Metode uništavanja Milene Močivnik išle su od priča da krijumčari drogu u tijelima nastradalih pasa, da zavodi svoju 9-godišnju kčer—–su bile stvarno zastrašujuće.

  1. Kao glavni neprijatelji Milene u to su vrijeme djelovali  istaknuti članovi slovenske animalističke scene u nastanku

( CITAT) : “Meta Malus (jasnovidka), Roman Turnšek (predsednik Društva proti mučenju živali Trbovlje), Matjaž Urleb (predsednik Društva za zaščito živali Ljubljana), Eva Dolinar (uradnica Mestne občine Ljubljana, članica različnih živalovarstvenih organizacij), Polona Samec (članica DZZŽ Ljubljana) …”

  1. Podršku su joj pružali ( CITAT ) :” Lea Eva Müller (svetovalna direktorica WSTA London), Primož Šterbenc (univerzitetni profesor), Irena Megušar (uradnica Ministrstva za kmetijstvo), Anej Sam (samostojni ustvarjalec na področju kulture), Boštjan Pihler (ekološki aktivist iz Zasavja), Mira Omerzel Mirit (glasbenica), Tomo Korošec (univerzitetni profesor), Zlatko Pavlica (predstojnik Klinike za kirurgijo in male živali Veterinarske fakultete v Ljubljani), Zlata Čop (veterinarka iz Lesc), Suzana Vodnjov (predsednica Društva proti mučenju živali Koroške) …”
  1.   Sekvestraciju pasa iz Mileninog azila je koordinirao VURS ( državni veterinat )na nalog dikretora Zoran Kovač
  1. Pri oduzimanju pasa je sodjelovalo  avstrijsko-njem društvo za zaščito životinja Tierhilfe Suden. Predstavnici tog društva so prije trdili, da je odličan azil, jedan od najboljših u Evropi.
  1. Od dana kada su joj oduzeli pse, naloženo je Mileni da u roku od sedam dana odstrani sve dokaze da je tu ikada postojao azil. Gdje je sada bila sva ona elita koja ju je podržavala?
  1. Prvu skupinu ( protiv Milene ) su podupirali mediji :Vaso Gasar in Matjaž Kranjec (urednik oziroma novinar Nedeljskega dnevnika), Romana Dobnikar Šeruga (takrat urednica Nedela), Helena Kocmur (novinarka Dela), Marjan Raztresen in Alma Lorenz (novinarja Slovenskih novic), Glorija Marinovič (novinarka Večera), Urška Kmetec (novinarka Dnevnika), Polona Šeško (novinarka Maga), Sabina Obolnar (urednica One), Alenka Arko (novinarka POP televizije) …
  1. A za Milenu su “radili” slijedeći ljudi iz medija : Bernarda Jaklin in Vinko Vasle (Jana), Mirko Munda in Bojan Tomažič (7D), Miroslav Zidar (Kinolog), Borut Veselko (Kanal A) …
  1. Milenu su, jedno vrijeme, podržavali javni djelatnici iz visoke politike i državni službenici .
  1. Zanimljivo je da su tri direktora Veterinarske Uprave R. Slovenije  do Milene imale suprotne stavove.Za Zorana Kovača i Simonu Salamon, Milena je bila problem, a za Vidu Čadonić-Špelić je bila pozitivna osoba.
  1. I predsjednik R Slovenije ,Milan Kučan je o Mileni dijelio pozitivno mišljenje javnosti.

  1. I premda je autor knjige bio oštar i direktan pa je režisere uništavanja Milene predstavio živopisnim imenima : Meta Malus»ledena ubojica «; Roman Turnšek je »krvožedni šakal«; Matjaž Urleb »kriminalac gandijevskog lika«; Zoran Kovač je »čovjek-disketa, koji će završiti u zatvoru «; »da pravna država djeluje bi bila  Romana Dobnikar Šeruga već davno u zavtoru « … –, nitko od prozvanih nije ni pokušao osporioti navode knjige ,a kamoli d abi autora pozvali na sud

Premda su javni mediji knjigu izgnorirali ( posve razumljivo) brijne likove je knjiga uzbunila, čak i političke stranke , Boruta Pahora itd…

Odmah po iozlasku knjige su mediji neko vrijeme dali prostor Malusove, Turnška, Urleba … ali ubrzo je sve utIhunlo i danas ih nema nigdje ..neki njihovi najveći podupiratelji iz redova novinarstva su napustili novinarstvo , radi savjesti ili po savjetu šefa, to ne znamo

O Mileni se više nije pričalo,a država je postala puno opreznija kada Je riječ o civilnoj sceni “zaštitara životinja”

Iz knjige je bilo jasno da je nalogodavac akcije sekvestracije pasa  bio predsjednik slovenske Veterinarske Uprave koji je u toj prilici prilično velika sredstva namijenio nekim nevladinim organizacijama ( i Urleobovom društvu ) za usluge oduzima pasa

Dokumenti objavljeni u knjizi sugeriraju da je bila riječ o pranju novxca jer da je on Zoran “disketa” dobio svoj dio nazad. Uskoro je javnost saznala za drugi dio njegovih aktivnosti radi kojih je i danas u kaznenom postupku,a njegov ga partner protiv Milene Turnšek strastveno branio da je Kovač moralan lik, da je riječ o političkom procesu

Premda je knjiga napisana sa krvlju ( rekao bi Niče ) mediji su je ignorirali ali to nije spriječilo da se knjiga po knjižnicama ne traži komad više ,a po kuloarima prepričava sve što se o autorima te afere moglo reći

Naravno da je knjiga priredila autoru prilično neugodnih trenutaka u autorovom životu od strane javnosti koju je on proglasio neljudskom Internet je proradio, klevete i optužbe protiv autora uz prijetnje su krenule sa raznih izvora

Putem internetskih foruma je krenula lavina laži i prijetnji protiv autora Anej Sam je potražio zaštitu suda no sud je optužbe obio obzirom da su  tuženi Meta Malus i Roman Turnšek izjavili da se oni ne služe internetom te da ih je netko drugi potpisivao

Romanu Turšeku koji  je deset godina javno masakrirao Milenu Močivnik,a ustanovljeno je da je na nenamjenski bankovni račun sakupljao sebi donacije namjienjene njenim psima i dalje je dugo apelira na nježna “slovenska” srca da se novac može uplatiti na žiro račuin njegovog društva Trbovlje

U knjizi o Mileni čitamo :” Ja znam da je netko morao napisati knjigu. Knjigu o svetom žrtvovanju i knjigu o srcu koje je iskrvavilo za sve nas, ljude i pse. O srcu koje je prevazišlo najteže. pobijedilo je sebe. O srcu kojeg su na putu u nebeske visine pojele stjenice!”

Milena je svojim životom dokazala, naglasio je autor, da se u životu uvijek isplati ostati na pravoj strani



link :

link :


link :


Azil Loznica Srbija – Psi na E bay Austrija – Njemačka po cijeni od 250 Eur


Psi iz srpskog azila Loznica, Srbija osvanuli su, početkom veljače 2012., na portalu E- bay
po cijeni od 190 Eur i 250 Eur!!!!

Prodaju ih ,fantomska austrijsko- srpska udruženje koji sebe vole predstaviti kao spasitelje.

U načelu je riječ o trgovini napuštenim psima

LINK : Austrijsko “udruženje ”
LINK: Srspko Udruzenje, Lunja, Loznica



No…ukoliko uvažimo da između
izvoza životinja koje im je društvo povjerilo na čuvanje ili što je netko ,kao slobodna osoba odlučio štititi
te između
udomljavanja napuštenih životinja kod dobrih obitelji jer je riječ o traumatiziranim psima
postoji vrijednosna razlika velika kao Svemir
postoji i ogromna razlika između ljudi koji životinje
poštuju i doživljavaju ih kao bića sa osjećajima te
ljudi koji na njihovoj prodaji  zarađuju .

Drugim rječima radi se o nekoj vrsti animalističke prostitucije
( ja tebe toliko  puno volim da neću dozvoliti da te nitko bije al’ ću zato  da te  prodam dobro )


Lako da je to samo individualan slučaj, da se događa samo u Srbiji, no isto se ovo odvija  i u ostalim državama regije, cool pred očima institucija, umotano u animalizam krše se zakoni o zaštiti životinja, zakoni o obveznom plaćanju poreza u trgovini, prodaja ŽIVE robe bez izdaje računa, prevare o služenju javnom dobru …

Psi se masovno  odvoze uz ustrajanje na prevari sretnih  udomljenja,
prevoze ilegalno preko granica Srbije, Hrvatske,Italije, Mađarske, Poljske, Španjolske, Bosne, Ukrajine, Rumunjske, Bugarske , Malte, Cipra, Grčke, Egipta, Crne Gore, Maldiva, Rusije … za Njemačku, Austriju, Švicarsku, Holandiju i tamo smještaju kod ljudi kojima plaćaju da drže životinju dok se ne nađe kupac, pa iz ruke u ruku, novac od prodaje se dijeli i stavlja u džep nekolicine uključenih u biznis.

Zarada čak i ne bi bila sporna kada bi se takav posao legalizirao pa bi se životinjama jamčila sigurnost kroz legalno i transparentno poslovanje te istinitost komunikacije sa javnosti

Tajnovitost u kojima  organizacije posluju i njihova potreba da od sebe rade mučenike daje jasan signal da tu nešto debelo ne štima.

Prisvajaju živa bića kao robu, robu koja nije njihova čak niti po tehničkom smislu svojine , mrcvare ih transportima, ilegalno prebacuju preko granica, krže niz zakona  i zatim prodaju putem e bay-a!!!

Sasvim je jasno tko je ovdje krvnik, a tko  žrtva!


  1. Tierschutz Aktiv
  • Ako želite udomiti stalno ili privremeno, držite se teme!!!!! Nemam vremena ua diskusije! Moram biti produktivna i raditi! Nemam vremena za šrajberaj i diskusije!!!!!
  • Susanne Theresia, podijelila sam na zid ovih grupa:  “hunde die älter sind….” da du ja hunde jeden alters hast! “hund esuchen ein zuhause”, “für alle tier und naturliebhaber, hund oder katze gesucht
  • Gabi Puschner, ja se javljam za privremeni smještaj ,ako nikoga ne nađete, ali ja ne mogu participirati u nikakvim troškovima jer nemam para
  • Hunde Loznica (Serbien)draga Gaib, javi se na private
  • Regina Dittrich‎…treba li i dalje dijeliti oglase??? Da li netko zna što je sa Minom? Nigdje je više ne nađem!!!
  • Hunde Loznica (Serbien)‎@Regina: Mina je otputovala već
  • Karola KöppingerDa li ste našli neki privremeni smještaj ? Imam ja ovu žensku u Austiji Ingrid Nachbarhundeinnot

    • Christina Zalesakda li ste našle mjesto. da li je pas već operiran? ( vidi fotku)
      • Eva Schmidt, ja mogu doći do Sombora  da ich drüben in HR lebe!
        • Tierschutz Aktiv javite se za dogovor
          Sandra Peciarolo–Da li nudite i mačke za udomljavanje ??

…. i tako su šverceri animalisti, na osmi dan, odlučili biti bolji od životinja, pa  životinjama ponudili dozu duboke ljudske sućuti.

Lavovi, tigrovi, pume ,vukovi i ostale ponosne zvijeri odbile su prihvatiti ruku sućuti obzirom da su znali ljudsku prirodu i ovi su se okrenuli  najmarganiliziranijima od svih životinja. Napuštenim životinjama.

To su životinje kojima su ljudi već davno slomili kičmu. nekada su imale obitelj, a onda završile u šinteraju, na ulicama, napuštenim zgradama…postale su ničije

I tada ih je ugledao “animalist švercer ” i dogodilo se …prosvijetljenje

Ako ne može urediti svoj život, urediti će njihov, tako da će njih prodati,a sebi uzeti pare

Uzalud su se psi i mačke opirale…

Zapadni je “animalist švercer ” sebi osigurao posao.

Istočni je animalist švercer  sebi osigurao posao.

A istinski zaštitnici ostali su zapanjeni …

A životinje?

Životnije su završile na ebay-u.

U vlasništvu reciklator napuštenih životinja koji posluju  pod  dogmom : ” udomljavamo sve -malo,veliko,mlado,staro,dvoje, troje, 50, hramavo, bez nogu, upišano, ukakano, ispovraćano, divlje, n

Sve se proda!

Živo čudo!

Navali narode, još malo pa nestalo.

Čim se potroši srpsko tržište odoše za Rusiju.

Cijena jednog psa iz azila Loznica, Srbija  190 EUR!

Drugi pas  250 EUR!

NEKOLIKO MISLI O PRODAJI PUTEM E BAY-a sa FB teme sprskih zaštitnika
koja se protive švercu pasa

Tanja Ostojic

Napušteni psi iz Loznice, ljudi ih šalju put Austrije ,a  nemaju pojma kod koga psi idu ,
nemaju udomitelje u momentu kada salju pse ,
smještaju ih u neke neimenovane privatne azile ,
neke misteriozne organizacije koje nemaju svoje azile,
neke fantomske klinike gdjeće ih liječiti ( zašto se vode bolesni psi?)

Oglasavaju se preko E bay .

Zar je to model “sretnog udomljavanja ” po kom se psi izvoze iz Srbije.

I jel još nekome nešto nije jasno?

Taca Galic-Zetovic

i gdje je tu dobro djelo ??uzmes psa i das ga nekom drugom da mu taj drugi trazi dom ?da su svi oni bar dovoljno fer ,pa da kazu: ja mogu prebaciti pse preko granice ,za tog i tog znam da imaju udomitelja,za tvog i jos deset njih nemamo,vec idu u foster gdje ce im oni pokusati naci dom.tebe ce to kostati toliko,stranci za psa daju toliko i toliko.kontakt udomitelja ti ne mogu dati,jer ga ne znam,oni tamo ce mi poslati slike ako udome bi ljudi imali sansu da razmisle da li vrijedi toliko rizikovati,prije no sto bilo kome daju psa.i zasto ,ako su vec stranci toliko darezljivi niko od njih ne trazi da se te iste pare ,daju ljudima koji mogu pruziti foster ili ga pruzaju ovdje u srbiji?ako je vec stanje toliko lose u srbiji,zasto ga ne unapredis ,ako si vec iskopao izvor prihoda ?ok udomi ta dva psa za koje imas dom u inostranstvo,ali foster mozes naci i ovdje ,za to sto ustedis na papirima,gorivu +250 eura ,pas ce i ovdje u fosteru zivjeti kao bubreg u loju.a lakse ces ga udomiti i znaces gdje si ga udomio.”

Šverc ” azilskim ” psima za Njemačku. Masovke iz Madjarske

Njemci su svjesni problema, godinama se bore protiv, no situacija je izmakla kontroli.

Sve veći broj pasa dnevno,  a preko istih ljudi kotrlja autocestama prema Njemačkoj, namijenjeno crnom tržištu.

Psi se voze po dva, tri u istom boxu.

Po 20 – 30 u kombiju, po 1000 km bez pauze za jelo, vodu, pišanje ili sranje…
Stignu na cilj ispovraćani, ukakani, upišani, smrdljivi, gladni i žedni, često  bolesni, ljeti bez klime, zimi bez grijanja

Umru u transportima, pobjegnu i stradaju na prometnicama …

Laju satima dok ne promuknu, plaču prestravljeni i užasnuti novim ljudima, mirisima, nepoznatim glasovima koji se izderavaju da umuknu.  Psi koji su već bili puni straha od nepoznatih ljudi…

Nema tamo divne obitelji koja čeka na jednog  psa.
Masovni transporti imaju samo jedan cilj.
Dovesti čim veći broj životinja. … ovakva organiyacija u reziji par osoba treba silnu infrastrukturu iza sebe i dubok dzep  financija
Potom objave fotografiju sa svilenih jastučića i zelenih livadica no istina je sasvim druga.

( Pogledati video na što nalikuje
jedan tipični ilegalni azil spremište za istočne pse  u Njemačkoj)

Biti će potrebno godina dana, a možda i više d anjemačka policija završi istragu i poveže sve elemente u jednu cjelinu jer šverc uličnim i psima iz azila Istočne i Južne Europe prerastao je u orgnaizirani kriminal sa igračima koji točno znaju svatko svoje uloge i pričaju uvijek iste pričice za lakovjerne .

1. Video

Kupili su psa preko weg oglasa, skupo su ga platili.
Pas je umro nakon par dana!
Pas je stigao šverc vezom iz Istočne Europe u Njemačku.

Tipična objava :

Die nechste transport bewegen am 27.01.2012. Freitag mit 9 Hunden! Bitte kontrolieren die daten und bitte jedermann bleiben in die nehe die treffpunkten!!!!!Der Fahrer kanst nicht zu viel warten.
Ich wüntsche alles gute und Danke für die adoptions!!!;)A da nije  je rijec o amaterima nego cvrstoj Organiyaciji svjedoce ovi oglasi

ACHTUNG!!!! SEHR INTERESSANTE INFORMATIONEN!!!Sämtliche Mißverständnisse vorzubeugen möchte ich folgendes mitzuteilen:Leider zur Zeit mache ich alles alleine, ehrenamtlich und das 24 Std/Tag. Ich habe eine Arbeitsstelle, wo ich mein Geld verdiene, da ich auch leben muß. Nebenbei rehabilitiere ich die Tiere, gestalte unsere webseite, unsere Seite am Facebook und betreue sämtliche andere Seiten. Ich bearbeite die Sachen von der Organisation, erledige die Briefwechsel, Buchhaltung, Bargeld-verwaltung, übernehme die Spenden an meinem Arbeitstelle – und ab jetzt habe ich auch den Fahrdienst an meinem Hals,- das bedeutet das ich kein Privatleben mehr habe.
Das Problem ist dass jede ist auf mich sauer wegen solche Dinge wofür ich nichts kann.Ich kann nur aus Infos und Daten arbeiten die für mich zur Verfügung stehen, leider die kommen Stückweise, so wie die Adoptivleute es zu Sinja schicken – sie leitet es mir gleich weiter.
So ist es es in der Zukunft nicht mehr machbar, ich kann so weiter keine Tiere retten in diesem Form, es ist ein riesen Stress und der Lieferung stimmt trotzdem nicht…also es muß viel besser organisiert werden.
Die Tiere warten auf die Ausreise in der Schinderei, da ich keine Pflegestellen habe.

Dazu dass ein Hund ausreisen kann müssen folgende Dinge erledigt werden!!!!!!:

1./ 14 Tage Karatene 2./ Tollwut Impfung 3./ 3 Woche Wartezeit 4./ Kombiimpfung dürfen die 14 Tage nach dem Tollwutimpfung bekommen /darauf muß man auch achten/
5./wenn der Ausreise Datum fest steht – können wir 4 Tage vorher die Tiere sterilisieren, weil keine PS zur Verfügung steht.
Ich muß paar Tage vor der Ausreise genau sagen können welche Tiere reisen und wohin ich muss genau sagen können wer und wo bezahlt die Fahrtkosten und wo ist ganz genau der Treffpunkt!
Wenn ich diese Daten nicht ganz genau weiß, dann es kann den ganzen Fahrplan durcheinander bringen und die Fahrkosten Plan auch verärndern. Die Fahrkosten hängt davon ab wieviele Hunde und wie weit müßen die fahren.Meistens zwischen 90-100 Euro/Tier
Dazu kommen noch folgende Ausgaben: chip + tollwut impfung – Reisepass – kombi impfung – gelegentlich sterilisation.
Dieser Betrag ist zwischen 170-220 Euro.
Die Tiere die sterilisiert werden – weil wir kein PS haben – bleiben 3-4 Tage im Tierklinik für halbe Preis.

Dazu das alles richtig organisiert werden kann sollten unten stehende Fragen richtig und vollständig ausgefüllt werden und so an Sinja weitergeleitet. So können wir sämtliche Mißvertändnisse vorbeugen.

6. ZAHLENDE BETRAG /ZW. 170-220 Euro/Hund
7. WIE MÖCHTEN DIE ES BEZAHLEN- Mit Überweisung, oder bei dem Fahrer?
8. TREFFPUNKT- falls es anders ist wie der angegebene Adresse.

Ohne diese Daten kann ich keine problemlose Fahrten organisieren, die Reservierungen kann ich nur in diesem Form annehmen. Wenn die oben stehende Fragen beantwortet sind, bitte es an Sinja weiterleiten…

Wir stellen von unsere Tiere – die mit dem nächsten Fahrt ausreisen – immer ein Album zusammen, die an unsere Seite sehbar ist, – sollte irgendwelche Veränderung berücksichtigt werden, dort ist es noch möglich….
Sinja bekommt es jedesmal von uns zugeschickt, sie ist also informiert welche Tiere werden mit dem nächsten Fahrt ausreisen.

Ich bedanke mich für ihre Verständniss- Betty Vidra-PCAS

Krvave žrtve za laboratorijske stolove, ispovijest njemačke zaštitarke

“Animal trade – Kradljivci \ivotinja su među nama  i nazivaju se “zaštitnici životinja”

A true history

Godinama su me poznanici uznimiravali vijestima o azilu smještenom u podru;ju gdje oni stanuju znajući da  vodim Orgaizaciju za zaštitu životinja te da su mi životinje na srcu.

Bezbroj me ljudi upozoravalo da u tom azilu  životinje nestaju.

Govorili su mi :” Pas, kojeg tamo predaš -nestane!”


Pričali su mi o noćnim transportima koji idu preko granice sa Nizozemskom, put laboratorija smrti.

Rekli da bezbroj transporta dolazi sa juga , prepuni pasa, koje iskrcaju u taj “azil.”

I uvijek, kada stigne novi , azil se prazni od pasa i azil koji je pucao po šavovima, odjednom prazan. Spreman za novi prihvat.

Pričalu su mi o mreži Udruženja koja su sve uključena i koja služe poput kampova za prihvat “izbjeglica” odnosno poput
alibija ukoliko bi ikada došlo do istrage.

Tijekom godina, sve veći broj građana mi je dojavljivao takve incidente. Mnogi su mi ostavljali svoje dokumente, rezultate istraga i predavali ih meni u ruke te tražili da nastavim.
Ti su ljudi dolazili k’ meni iz skoro cijele Njemačke.


Iz susjedstva se znalo događati da mačke< ali i psi, nestanu. Javili bi da su prethodno vidjeli higijeničarski servis u toj zoni i to baš takve koji surađuju sa tim azilom.

To me dovelo da u suradnji sa još nekoliko osoba, koje su individualno godinama istraživale istu temu, osnujemo neformalno udruženje i udružimo informacije i znanje.

Počeli smo sakupljati podatke pri Vet Upravi.

Jedan od uposlenika me upoznao sa svjedokinjom koja mi je rekla da ukoliko informacije tražiš od Voditelja tog azila da ćeš trebati body guard zaštitu.  Ona je imala puno dokumentacije o njihovim poslovima ali nije mogla ništa s tim.

” Ah, pomislila sam -eo, imamo dobru bazu za dobar start!”

U to vrijeme kad je nestao veći broj mačaka pozvao me policajaca koji radi za federalnu Vladu. Ovaj mu je veterinar
dao moj telefonski broj i kazao da bih mu  mogla pomoći.

I njemu je nestala mačka koju je tražio i policajac se pokazao spremnim da se poslovanje tog azila pretraži natenane.


Zajedno smo pretražili sve informacije koje sam imala, prošli kroz velik broj foldera , surađivali smo sve do dana dok me nije nazvao i kazao da je dobio upozorenje. Ukoliko nastavi “kopati” po temi njegov život i život njegove obitelji biti će ugrožen.

Šokirala sam se i na neko vrijeme sve aktivnosti oko tog pitanja odložila sa strane.

No, informacije su nastavile pristizati i bile smo već preduboko u tome.

Od jednog sada već bivšeg predsjednika azila iz Turske dobili smo informaciju da njemačko Udruženje koje tamo
operira sa napuštenim životinjama šalje te životinje ne samo za Njmeačku nego preko Grčke pravac za laboratorije u Nizozemskoj!

Unajmile smo detektiva. No što se dogodilo?
On je uskoro promijenio stranu, uzeo svu našu dokumentaciju i prodao ih “drugoj strani!”

Predali smo prijavu na Policiju o krađi dokumenata i u otprilike isto vrijeme svi materijali sa mojeg hard disca su
Uspjeli smo ih spasiti iz “temporary foldera” i tada sam shvatila da je vrijeme da uključim krim policiju , smjer informatika i zatražim istragu.
Inspektor se duboko zainteresirao za cijelu temu, svjedoci su pred njim pričali svoja iskustva sa tim tipom azila, vezano uz dokumentacije koje su i sami sakupljali godinama, nevjerojatne stvari o transportima ali svi su se plašili potpisati, nisu se željeli inkriminirati.  I sve bi zapelo u mrtvi rukavac.


Posjetila me jedna žena koja je zajedno sa svojim dečkom željela spasiti pse iz Španjolske pa je svjedočila da voze te pse ,skroz iz Španjolske do Njemačke, bez vode , bez šanse da ih puste iz boksova te da takvo stanje traje godinama.

Kad stginu do Njemačke, psi se bez pauze prebacuju u nove transportere, njemačkih azila i nastavljaju put, bez vode, bez hrane, bez pauze.

Oni su tražili da se psima da barem vode ali bi “šef” azila rekao da za to nema vremena. Prebacivali bi ih šutke, brzinom svjetlosti u novo trnasportno vozilo i nastavljali putovanje.
A žena je skoro plakala prepričavajući mi kako se vlasnik azila izražava o tim jednim psima.

Kaže :”Stigla je nova roba!”

Jedna je od žena, koju je tema zainteresirala radila pri Federal Criminal Police Office in Wiesbaden pa nije htjela istupiti javno.  Rekla je da ako nešto poduzme protiv vlasnika tih azila njezine će životinje pootrovati i kuću zapaliti i zato nije htjela nastupiti javno na sudu ali je odlučila svjedočiti pri Vet. Upravi.

Sav materijal smo poslali  na Urednicu West German Radio koja je napisala popratni tekst.

SUD : Azil se mora preregistrirati u komercijalnu djelatnost

Opet smo imale dokaz i obzirom da za sebe mislimo da volimo životinje te da nam je stalo do njihove sudbine, sakupile smo 10 000 EIR i unajmile odvjetnika koji djeluje u polju zaštite životinja.

Susreli smo se s njim, on se upoznao sa dokazima, zainteresirao i preuzeo slučaj. Jedini “uspjeh” koji smo postigli pri Sudu jest bio taj da je taj azil morao preregistrirati djelatnost u komercijalnu ali on nije “odradio” ono za što smo ga mi angažirale.
Kasnije smo doznale da on radi i za Udruženje koje posluje sa životinjama iz Južne Europe.

Ponovno smo zapele u mrtvi rukavac pravde. Naše su nade propale, nema šanse da pomognemo tim životinjama.

A toliko je bilo sumnjiviih detalja, od toga da Organizacija nudi kao azil kontakt  i putem web stranice sa fotografijama neku adresu gdje kao “spašava i smješta životinje ”  ,a tamo uopće nema pasa.

I druge su nam veće Organizacije potvrdile usmeno da postojivelika šansa da se životinje proslijeđuju za laboratorije ali
nitko nije želio zagristi u tu kompleksnu temu.

TRANSPORTI SA PO 100 PASA i po 2x na mjesec

Bilo je slučajeva da transporti dovoze i po 100 pasa 2x na mjesec u taj azil! Azil je smješten granično, ovaj kraj granice sa Nizozemskom, udaljen od civilizacije, usred ničega ,a sebe su predstavljali kao rekordera udomljavanja??!!
Onaj tko se malo bavio takvim temama zna da je to nemoguće!

Mi smo organizirale peticije, informirale ministre, pisali svim većim Organizacijama koje se zalažu za zaštitu prava životinja ali ništa…

Kao da imaš posla sa zidom, o toj temi se šuti!

Sve je blokirano. jedan je od hrabrijih veterinrskih kirirga, u usmenom razgovoru između nas nekoliko, rekao koji azili predavaju životinje za laboratorije te da to zakonodavac tolerira.

Naša pravna akcija protiv tog azila nije prošla bez posljedica.

Kolegica koja se zadužila da plati odvjetnika morala je platiti sudske troškove.
Usred noći su joj kamenjem polupali prozore na kući.


Otprilike u isto vrijeme imala sam prometnu nezgodu u kojoj sam preživjela za dlaku. Kočnice nisu radile.
Nisam mogla dokazati da su izmanipulirane ali bilo je vrlo čudno.

Isti ljudi koji dojavljuju, naš PC je bio hakiran, ukradeni podatci, ljudi koji su nam se priključivali samo da bi nas špijunirali …

Mene osobno su prokazali i difanirali, ne direktno vlasnici azila ali mislim aa je nalog došao sa te strane.

Naša se prijava mjesecima zavlačila, otezala i na kraju odložila

Nakon 7 godina žestoke borbe da otkrijem što se događa ja sam odlučila stati.  Kada je riječ o istraživanju o životinjama koje trebaju za laboratorije, možeš samo luiti u opći zid šutnje .

Op-a- O društvenoj sramoti, obično svi šute. Tabu tema

Roba koje nikada ne nedostaje  uz vrlo pristupacne cijene

Mogućnost da se napustene  životinje rabe po labosima otvaraju upravo zakonodavne vlasti kako  Njemačke a tako  i ostalih država Europe.

Upravo su brojni vladini instituti i itraživačke agencije prvi kojima takva @roba@  treba .

Stoga nas ne treba čuditi da u zakonu ima puno “rupa” kojima je to omogućeno.

Moraju imati otvorenu mogucnost da dobiju “robe” koliko žele i u količinama koje nikada ne nedostaju,   za vrlo pristupačne cijene!

Taj ^proizvod^se umata u drustveno prihvatljive termine  poput zastite zivotinja i organiyacije se medusobno pokrivaju i kamufliraju u opce drustveno prihvatljivo / mi stitimo zivotinje /okruzenje.

Moralna dvojbenost prema brojnim donatorima koje takve aktivnosti financiraju je neupitna.

Neizmjerno je zlo prema ljudima koji naivno vjeruju da te zivotinje idu u @bolju buducnost@ sto yakon sve lijepo zamota kao visoko moralno vrijedno drustveno ponasanje  .


U 2009. godini napustila sam Organiyaciju, u me]uvremenu je EU vec usvojila Program @  ” Stray Dog population progrief @

Profit koji se na ovaj na;in, ubijanjem pasa dobije, nije za potcijeniti. Tijekom 2010. godine je zakon upotpunjen
i sluzbeno je omoguceno i uporaba macaka za potrebe laboratorijskih mucenja.

Moyete pronaci vise infromacija u Apendix na dnu ovog pisma

Ukoliko netko od nas zeli ovo promijeniti mora  informirati gradane Njemacke .
Zgrazavanje, demo tekstovi, peticije nemaju uspjeha.

Mislimo da treba ukljuciti moderne medije.

Ukljuciti simboliku party donacija koje upozoravaju na farma industriju i uporabu zivotinja posaljite na sve adrese.
10 Eur politickim strankama po vasem iyboru uy tekstove koji upoyoravaju na ovu situaciju.

Adrese mozete pronaci u prilogu.  Nama bi bilo drago da primimo vas feedback.
Nadamo se da ce velik broj vas pristupiti podjeli ovog materijala.

Objavljujte putem okruglih stolova ili internet stranica.

Ukoliko Vas zanima stupiti u kontakt sa nama, dobrodosli.


Gabriele Hilbig
Gabriele Menzel
Gisela Urban
Claudia Sunitsch
Internationaler Zusammenschluss für Tierschutz



Tierhandel – Die Täter sind in unserer Mitte
und nennen sich Tierschützer

Eine wahre Geschichte

Ich leitete jahrelang einen Verein und bekam Beschwerden von unzähligen Personen über ein Tierheim in unserer Gegend zugetragen. Die Menschen sagten mir, dass, wenn dort Hunde abgegeben würden, sie für immer verschwinden würden. Sie berichteten mir von nächtlichen Tiertransporten über die NL- Grenze, die von da aus in den Tierversuch gebracht würden. Sie berichteten mir von regelmäßigen Großtransporten, mit denen Hunde aus dem Süden in dieses Tierheim gebracht wurden. Und wann immer diese einträfen, würde das vorher noch halb volle Tierheim auf einmal leer sein. Sie berichteten mir von einem Netzwerk von Tierheimen, die involviert sein sollten und die sowohl als Auffanglager als auch als Alibi-Funktion dienten, wenn wieder mal große Mengen von Tieren aus dem Tierheim verschwunden waren und Nachfragen kamen. Immer mehr Leute wurden es im Laufe der Jahre, die mir davon berichteten. Es gab sogar einige, die mir Unterlagen, Zeitungsberichte und ihre Recherchen überließen, damit ich mich um den Fall kümmern sollte. Die Leute kamen aus ganz Deutschland.
Dann kam eine Zeit, in der viele Tiere, hauptsächlich Katzen. aber auch Hunde, bei uns verschwanden. Eine Frau berichtete, sie hätte den Tierfängerwagen in einem Tierheim gesehen, dass mit diesem Tierheim kooperierte. Inzwischen hatte ich mich mit mehrer Frauen zu einer Kooperation entschlossen, die seit Jahren in dieser Angelegenheit recherchierten und viel Hintergrundwissen mitbrachten. Wir begannen, das Veterinäramt in die Sache einzuschalten.
Die dortige Sachbearbeiterin teilte mir im Beisein eines Zeugen mit, dass, wenn sie den Leiter dieses Tierheims angreifen würde, sie einen Bodyguard bräuchte.
Sie hätte ordnerweise Beschwerden über dieses Tierheim vorliegen, aber sie könnte nichts tun. Aha, dachte ich zum ersten Mal, da scheint ja schon eine mächtig große Sache im Gange zu sein. In der Zeit, in der die vielen Katzen verschwanden, rief mich ein Polizist an, der für die Bundespolizei arbeitet. Er hatte meine Telefonnummer von eben dieser Amtstierärztin erhalten. Auch er vermisste eine Katze und er sagte mir, er wäre dazu bereit, dafür zu sorgen, dass dieses Tierheim gestürmt würde. Wir machten uns gemeinsam an die Arbeit, recherchierten, trugen Fakten zusammen. Eines Tages sagte er mir, er würde sich aus dieser Sache rausziehen. Wenn er weitermachen würde, wäre sein Leben und das seiner Familie in Gefahr.
Wir standen erst mal unter Schock und eine Zeit stellten wir unsere Aktivitäten ein.
Doch schon bald kamen neue Informationen und wir suchten weiter nach Möglichkeiten, wie wir dafür sorgen konnten, dieses Tierheim zur Aufgabe zu zwingen. Inzwischen hatten wir von einem ehemaligen Leiter eines Tierheims aus der Türkei die Information, dass der deutsche Tierheimbetreiber von dort nicht nur Tiere holte, die in Deutschland vermittelt werden sollten, sondern das er Hunde auf dem Seeweg, über Griechenland, an ein Versuchslabor in den NL liefern würde. Wir kümmerten uns um einen Detektiv.
Doch, wen erstaunt es noch, dieser wechselte plötzlich die Seiten. Er verkaufte unsere Recherchen und Unterlagen, die wir ihm zur Verfügung stellten für über 2000 € an die Gegenseite. Wir erstatteten Anzeige gegen den falschen Detektiv und der Ordner den der Tierheimleiter mit unseren Daten hatte, wurde von der Polizei eingezogen. Etwa zeitgleich konnte ich feststellen, als ich Daten über das Tierheim speicherte, dass diese aus den Dateien vom Computer verschwanden. Ich zog den Netzstecker und fand sie noch im Papierkorb des Computers wieder. Nun schaltete ich die Kripo, Fachgebiet Computerkriminalität ein. Ich bat, sie nicht nur den Computer auf Zugriffe zu prüfen, sondern gleichzeitig alle unsere über den Tierheimleiter gesammelten Unterlagen zu sichten, und wenn möglich, rechtlich gegen diesen vorzugehen. Der Kripobeamte, ein sehr engagierter Mensch, mühte sich redlich, lud Zeugen vor, begann mit eigenen Ermittlungen, aber es erging ihm wie mir und wie schon dem Bundespolizeibeamten zuvor. Die Leute redeten offen über die unglaublichen Dinge, die im Tierheim geschahen, über die Transporte, über Auffälligkeiten, aber keiner wollte etwas unterschreiben. Alle hatten Angst. So war auch diese Anzeige, wie unzählige davor, eine Sackgasse.
Eine Frau rief mich an, die zusammen mit einer Freundin einen Transport für das Tierheim begleitet hatte. Beide besuchten mich und meine Mitstreiterinnen, die mit mir diese Sache seit Jahren verfolgten. Sie berichteten, dass die Hunde auf dem ganzen Transport von Spanien nach Deutschland kein Wasser bekommen durften, dass sie nicht aus den Boxen geholt werden durften. Und als der Transport in Deutschland an den Tierheimleiter ü berge ben wurden, etwa 100 Km vom Tierheim entfernt, wurden die Tiere in den Transporter des Tierheims umgeladen. Auch da kein kurzer Gassigang, kein Wasser, keine Nahrung. Sie wurden in Windeseile in andere Boxen verfrachtet und weiter ging die Fahrt. Die beiden Frauen fragten, ob sie den Tieren nicht wenigstens Wasser geben könnten, doch der Tierheimleiter antwortet, sie hätten keine Zeit. Und ein anderer Satz brachte die Frauen fast zum Weinen:
Er sagte: Her mit der Ware!
Eine der beiden Frauen arbeitete angeblich beim BKA in Wiesbaden. Vielleicht wollte sie deshalb nicht an die Öffentlichkeit. Sie sagte, wenn sie etwas gegen diesen Tierheimleiter unternehmen würden, könnten sie damit rechnen das ihr Haus brennen würde oder ihre Tiere vergiftet würden. Zu einer Zeugenaussage bei der Kripo war sie nicht bereit, ebenso wenig war sie zu einer Aussage beim zuständige Veterinäramt bereit. Alles, was wir als Beweis für dieses Geschehnis hatten, war eine Mail an eine WDR Redakteurin, der sie diese Geschichte geschrieben hatte. Wieder hatten wir Beweise, erstatteten Anzeige und erlebten, dass diese eingestellt wurde.
Einer Tierschützerin der es sehr am Herzen lag, das Treiben des Tierheimleiters zu stoppen, zahlte 10 000 € an einen Rechtsanwalt, der auf Tierschutz spezialisiert ist. Er traf sich mit uns, sah Chancen und übernahm den Fall. Auch diesem überließen wir alle unsere Recherchen. Der einzige Erfolg: Er erwirkte über das Veterinäramt, dass der Tierheimleiter einen gewerblichen Handel als Transporteur anmelden musste. Das, wozu er engagiert worden war, machte er nicht. Wie wir später feststellten, arbeitete der Anwalt für einen Verein in Südeuropa. Und dieser Verein kooperierte mit dem Tierheimleiter, gegen den der Anwalt etwas unternehmen sollte. Also wieder eine Sackgasse, wieder eine Hoffnung, die den Bach hinunterging. Was wir auch unternahmen, es gab keinen Weg, den Tieren, die in den Versuch gingen, zu helfen.
Da waren so viele Hinweise, so viele Auffälligkeiten, die wir aufzeigen konnten. Häuser, die als Tierheim angegeben waren, sogar mit Hinweis auf einer städtischen Internetseite, in denen gar kein Tierheim war. Eine Anschrift, auf die alle Vereine, die dieser Tierheimleiter bis heute betreibt, gemeldet sind, aber in dem Haus war von außen nichts erkennbar, was auf Tierschutz schließen ließ, bis auf einen Briefkasten und eine Türklingel. Größere Tierschutz Organisationen bestätigten uns von Tiertransporten zu Tierversuchszwecken Kenntnis zu haben, aber niemand unternahm etwas. Es gab Zeiten in denen kamen laut unseren Recherchen fast zwei mal im Monat Großtransporte mit bis zu 100 Hunden dort an. Das Tierheim liegt grenznah zu den Niederlanden, völlig abgelegen, mitten in der Pampa und sollte angeblich die ankommenden Hunde immer in kürzester Zeit vermittelt haben. Wer Tierschutz betreibt weiß, dass so etwas unmöglich ist.
Wir reichten Petitionen ein, beschwerten uns bei Ministerien, dass dieser Sache nicht ausreichend nachgegangen wurde, schrieben bei Verstößen gegen das Tierschutzgesetz Anzeigen. Alles wurde abgeblockt. Ein mutiger Amtsveterinär gab in einem Gespräch, an dem mehrere Personen teilnahmen zu, das Tierheime Tierschutztiere in den Tierversuch geben dürften, das Gesetz ließe das zu.
Unsere Aktionen gegen den Tierheimleiter blieben nicht ohne Gegenwehr. Eine Mitstreiterin, die sich danach ganz zurückzog, bekam ein Unterlassungsver-fahren an den Hals und musste viel Geld bezahlen. Bei einer anderen Tierschützerin aus unserer Gruppe flog nachts ein Stein durch die Glashaustüre. Auch ich wurde angezeigt, hatte aber soviel Beweismaterial, dass die Anzeige eingestellt wurde. Eine Zeit später hatte ich einen schweren Autounfall, den ich nur um ein Haar überlebte. Die Bremsen hatten nicht reagiert. Niemand konnte feststellen, dass die Bremsen manipuliert waren, aber merkwürdig war es schon. Wiederholt kamen Personen in unseren Tierschutzverein, die große Probleme machten, unseren Computer ausspionierten, Daten stahlen und bei einigen war ich mir im Nachhinein sicher, dass sie bei uns eingeschleust worden waren. Ich wurde angezeigt und verleumdet, nicht von dem Tierheimleiter, aber ich denke, es hatte auf Umwegen damit zu tun. Völlig haltlose Anschuldigungen führten dazu, dass dieses Verfahren unverhältnismäßig lange ausgedehnt wurde. Erst eine Beschwerde beim Justizministerium bewirkte, dass der ermittelnde Beamte abgezogen wurde, ein anderer das Verfahren beendete und dieses schließlich eingestellt wurde.
Nach über sieben Jahren Kampf, der keinen Erfolg mit sich brachte, entschied ich mich, mit dem Tierschutz aufzuhören. Wenn es um Tiere geht, die in den Tierversuch gehen und für Tierversuche benötigt werden, stößt man auf eine Mauer des Schweigens. Unsere Regierung in Deutschland und auch die EU schreiben diese Tierversuche vor. Unzählige Regierungs-Institute führen selber Tierversuche durch. Muss man sich da wundern, das es unzählige Schlupflöcher im Gesetz gibt die es ermöglichen das Versuchsmaterial in ausreichender Zahl und zu erschwinglichen Preisen zu bekommen? Die Ware Tier muss herangeschafft werden, auch über solche Organisationen, die möglicherweise zwei Standbeine haben und sich als Tierschützer tarnen? Moralisch verwerflich, ein Betrug den Spendern gegenüber, die im guten Glauben solchen Vereinen Geld spenden. Ein Betrug denen gegenüber, die glauben die Tiere bekämen eine gute Zukunft. Per Gesetz handeln die Täter womöglich korrekt, leisten dem Staat sogar einen wertvollen Dienst.
2009 verließ ich den Verein, zu der Zeit hatte die EU die Umsetzung des „Stray Dog Population Program“ bereits beschlossen. Der Profit den die getöteten Hunde einbringen, ist nicht zu unterschätzen. 2010 folgte die Gesetzesänderung, die nun offiziell erlaubt Katzen mit Freigang für Tierversuche zu missbrauchen. Mehr Informationen findet ihr im Anhang dieser E-Mail oder auf unserer Internetseite.
Wenn wir daran etwas ändern wollen, müssen wir Bürger in Deutschland unserer Regierung dies mitteilen. Beschwerden, Demos, Petitionen hatten keinen Erfolg. Darum haben wir uns eine medienwirksamere Sache ausgedacht.
Parteispenden der Pharmaindustrie bewirken, dass Tierschützer in Gesetzgebungsverfahren, die mit Tierversuchen zu tun haben, immer das Nachsehen haben werden. Darum bitten wir Euch alle, an einer Parteispendenaktion teilzunehmen, bei der jeder der mitmachen möchte, 1 € an eine Partei seiner Wahl, mit dem Vermerk: „NEIN ZU TIERVERSUCHEN!“ spenden sollte. Es geht um die Menge der Überweisungen, nicht um die Höhe der Summe.
Im Anhang findet ihr Spendenkonten und Anschriften für die, die per Brief spenden möchten. Über ein Feedback würden wir uns freuen. Wir hoffen auf zahlreiche Teilnehmer bei dieser Aktion. Verteilen der Rundmail ausdrücklich erwünscht. Ihr dürft diese Rundmail und die Anhänge auch auf euren Internetseiten veröffentlichen.
Wenn jemand aus dem Verteiler genommen werden möchte, bitte kurz mitteilen.
Gabriele Hilbig
Gabriele Menzel
Gisela Urban
Claudia Sunitsch
Internationaler Zusammenschluss für Tierschutz

Dateikommentar: 1 € gegen Tierversuche
1 € gegen Tierversuche.doc [625 KiB]
34-mal heruntergeladen
Dateikommentar: Anschreiben Briefspender
Anschreiben Briefspender.doc [20 KiB]
26-mal heruntergeladen
Dateikommentar: Stray Dog Control Program wirtschaftlich effizient lösen
Stray Dog Control Program wirtschaftlich effizient lösen.doc [39.5 KiB]
30-mal heruntergeladen

CRNA KRONIKA : Šverc štencima i odraslim uličnim psima Bosna, Hrvatska,Austrija, Njemačka

   Šverc štencima i uličnim psima na ruti Bosna -Hrvatska-Austrija -Njemačka
( fenomen, traje godinama )

1. Slučaj  , 22 štenca !

22 ausgesetzte Welpen in Bosnien suchen dringend Pflege- oder Endstellen
Publiziert am 25. Mai 2011

Hilferuf aus Bosnien

22 Welpen wurden zusammen am 19.5. an einer Lokation in Sarajevo,
Bosnien, gefunden.

Alter 6 – 16 Wochen. von 3 verschiedenen Muetter (aber mit keiner Mutter dabei).

bitte helfen und weiterverbreiten

Kontakt in


Name: nicht angegeben
Ort: nicht angegeben
Telefon: nicht angegeben
FB :


2.   11 ŠTENACA, 10 UMRLO

Montag, 31. Jänner 2011 13:22

Hallo Sylvia,
Danke das du dich gemeldet hast.
Es gibt eine neue ganz grosse Familie, die sind in Bosnien und dort gibt es keine Tierheime, es sind sogar 11 Welpen, 9 von 4 monaten, und 2 ganz kleine – etwa 1 Monat. Die grossen 9 sind auf der Strasse seit Geburt es gab sie sogar 27 von 3 verschiedenen Mutter, 10 sind gestorben durch Krankheiten und manche sind auch vom Autos ueberfahren worden, 7 haben ein Zuhause gefunden aber die 9 die uebergeblieben sind warten schon soooo lange und essen jeden 3. Tag.

Es sind 3 Huendinen und 6 Rueden von 4 Monaten, plus 2 kleine 1 monat alt- (weiss nicht das geschlecht von denen)
Weiss nicht wie gross diese Hunde wachsen waerden, wahrscheinlich mittel-gross bis gross. 15 – 30 kilo.

Ich bin Kroatien, und diese neue Welpen in Bosnien, wenn man ein Zuhause fuer
sie finden wuerde koennte man irgendiwie dort jemanden zahlen um sie zu mir zu fahren (8h entfernt ) und dann koennte ich sie nach Graz fahren, das ist 3 h entfernt, wenn es dort eine Pflegestelle gaebe. Wenn du mir helfen koenntest irgendwie bitte melde dich wieder wenn du was zum vorschalgen hast.




Share on Technorati

7 Huendinnen die 2 Monate alt sind suchen DRINGEND PS fuer 27.5.‏
Subject: weiterleiten: 7 Huendinnen die 2 Monate alt sind suchen DRINGEND PS fuer 27.5.
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 12:22:13 +0200
From: Ena Pehlivanovic <>
To: <>

Bitte weiter verbreiten!

7 Huendinnen von dem Photo suchen PS DRINGEND!!!

Ich fahre sie am 27.5 nach Muenchen am Abend und ich brauche dringend Abnehmer von dort!

45 euro ist es pro Hund fuer den geimpften, mikrochippten, entwurmten Hund mit Pass plus noch ein wenig Transport Kosten an die man beteiligen sollte.

Bitte hilft und gibt ihnen eine bessere Zukunft, ich moechte die 7 nicht in Bosnien lassen das sie sterben!

Bitte meldet euch bei mir im email oder auf meine handy 00385 98 186 52 69 ich spreche Deutsch!

L.G .Ena



Gesendet: 18:44 Samstag, 18.Juni 2011
Betreff: Wer kennt Ena Pehlivanovic

—- Weitergeleitete Mail —-
Von: Hundehilfe Sonja <>
An: Verteiler Angela Grillmeier <>; Verteiler Claudia <>; Verteiler Gaby Strasser <>; Verteiler Hannelore Barke <>;; Verteiler Tanja Schäfer <>

Gesendet: Samstag, den 18. Juni 2011, 14:03:51 Uhr
Betreff: Wer kennt Ena Pehlivanovic

Nur Intern, keine Weiterleitung oder Veröffentlichung in Foren.
Bin da an einer merkwürdigen Sache und suche nun Antworten.

Wer hat Auskünfte (werden vertraulich behandelt) über Ena Pehlivanovic die in Bosnien hilft.


Subject: Rotti, rottweiler mix maedchen, 2 jahre alt, unheimlich lieb,
braucht ein Zuhause, wohnt auf der Strasse schon 8 Monate
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 15:04:46 +0200
From: Ena Pehlivanovic <>
To: <>
Rotti, rottweiler mix maedchen, 2 jahre alt, unheimlich lieb, braucht ein
Zuhause, wohnt auf der Strasse schon 8 Monate

Das letzte mal hatte sie 9 Welpen, alle sind gestorben.

Dieses mal hatte sie 11 Welpen, nur noch 5 sind am Leben und brauchen
dringend Hilfe, 10 Wochen alt. Leider habe ich keine Photos von den Welpen.

Bitte weiterleiten, ende des Monats waere es moeglich sie nach Oesttereich
oder Deutschland zu bringen, mit ihren Welpen.
Miniaturansicht angehängter Grafiken

Klicke auf die Grafik für eine größere Ansicht</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
<p>Name:	IMG_5167.jpg<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
Hits:	17<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
Größe:	57,3 KB<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
ID:	107542   Klicke auf die Grafik für eine größere Ansicht</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
<p>Name:	IMG_5168.jpg<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
Hits:	17<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
Größe:	38,2 KB<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
ID:	107543   Klicke auf die Grafik für eine größere Ansicht</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
<p>Name:	IMG_5170.jpg<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
Hits:	17<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
Größe:	51,9 KB<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
ID:	107544   Klicke auf die Grafik für eine größere Ansicht</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
<p>Name:	IMG_5174.jpg<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
Hits:	17<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
Größe:	34,7 KB<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
ID:	107545




Gospođi iz Waldviertel Austrija, policija oduzela 49 pasa koje je držala u nehumanim uvjetima,
uskrajućujući im osnovno.
Žena, koja za sebe kaže da pse spašava, bavi se u slobodno vrijeme “udomljavanjem” za Udrugu “Welpen in Not”.
Policija u suradnji sa gradskom veterinarskom službom ustanovila da je stanje sa životinjama neprihvatljivo , optuživši je za zlostavljanje životinja.


“Einer Tierhalterin im Waldviertel sind am Dienstag von der Polizei und dem Amtstierarzt 49 Hunde abgenommen worden. Die Frau, die nach Angaben der Sicherheitsdirektion einen Verein namens “Welpen in Not” betreibt, hatte 43 erwachsene und sechs Jungtiere auf ihrem Grundstück außerhalb einer kleinen Ortschaft im Bezirk Zwettl gehalten. Der Zustand der Hunde und des Geländes seien miserabel gewesen, hieß es.

Anzeige wegen Tierquälerei
Aktiv wurden die Behörden aufgrund einer Anzeige wegen Tierquälerei.

Der Amtsarzt nahm der Frau daraufhin die Tiere ab. Sie wurden am Nachmittag von der Tierrettung und dem Tierschutzverein abgeholt und auf mehrere Tierheime aufgeteilt, wo sie nun versorgt werden. Die Frau wird angezeigt.




SO | 05.02.2012
Oft landen die Welpen vom Kofferraum direkt im Tierheim. (Bild: dpa)
CHRONIK 29.05.2011
Hundedrama: Welpen beschlagnahmt
Ein Tierdrama hat die Landesregierung auf dem Walserberg aufgedeckt: Bei einer Razzia auf der Westautobahn haben die Beamten 24 Hundewelpen beschlagnahmt. Die jungen Hunde wurden ins Tierheim gebracht. Dieses ersucht um Hilfe.
Ermittlungen über Internet
Die Tiere waren in einem Pkw in Schachteln zusammengepfercht. Der illegale Transport sollte von Ex-Jugoslawien nach Deutschland führen. Es ist der zweite große Welpenfund innerhalb von drei Wochen.Den entscheidenden Hinweis haben die Zollbehörden geliefert: Im Internet waren in Deutschland schon Plätze für die Hundewelpen gesucht worden. Heimische Fahnder sind so auf die Spur der Schmuggler gekommen. Die Hunde dürften aus Bosnien oder Kroatien stammen.Es handelt sich vor allem um Bordercollie-Mischlinge. Einige der Welpen sind so jung, dass die Rasse noch nicht einwandfrei festgestellt werden kann. Der Zustand der Tiere ist den Umständen entsprechend gut, heißt es. Sie brauchen aber alle medizinische Betreuung.
Tierheim an Grenze der Belastbarkeit
Schon Anfang Mai waren an der Glan in der Stadt Salzburg zehn Welpen gefunden worden. Diese Tiere sind von ihren Besitzern ausgesetzt worden. Alle diese Welpen sind im zuletzt umstrittenen Salzburger Tierheim untergebracht worden. Dort sind derzeit sieben Pfleger mit der Betreuung der insgesamt über 30 Jungtiere beschäftigt.Trotzdem sei das Tierheim mit der Welpenflut an seine Belastungsgrenze gekommen, heißt es aus dem Vorstand. Das Tierheim sucht jetzt vor allem Decken, Handtücher und alte Leintücher und hofft dabei auf die Hilfe privater Tierfreunde.Wie lang die Welpen im Tierheim bleiben müssen, das ist noch unklar.


Šverc. 15 Štenaca u kritičnom stanju , Slovačka-Austrija

Würmer, Räude, Knochenbrüche: 15 geschmuggelte Welpen in kritischem Zustand

Eisenstadt / Rechnitz (aho) – 15 der insgesamt 56 Welpen, die in der Nacht auf Dienstag im PKW eines 54-jährigen Slowaken auf der Autobahn A 2 bei Loipersdorf (Österreich) entdeckt worden waren, müssen in einer Tierklinik stationär behandelt werden. Wie die Tierklinik mitteilt, leiden die Welpen an massivem Wurmbefall, Augenentzündungen und an Durchfall. Bei einem Welpen wurde mit einer Röntgenaufnahme festgestellt, dass beide Hinterläufe gebrochen sind………


Šverc 13 štenaca iz Mađraske u Austriju bez dokumenata , u kartonskoj kutiji

Ohne gültige Papiere aus Ungarn: 13 Hundewelpen im Kofferraum

Lübeck (aho) – Am Montag, gegen 12.00 Uhr, haben Beamte des Polizeiautobahnreviers Scharbeutz auf dem Parkplatz Neustädter Bucht in Fahrtrichtung Norden im Kofferraum eines schwedischen Kombi PKWs in drei Pappkartons 13 Hundewelpen gefunden………..


Wien / Oberwart (aho) – Die Österreichische Polizei hat am Montagabend bei einer Schwerpunktaktion an der A 2 bei Markt Allhau einen Kastenwagen mit 137 Hundebabys gestoppt. Zwei Slowaken wollten die winselnde Fracht von Pata in der Slowakei nach Lomoviejo in Spanien bringen.
Wie der „Kurier“ berichtet, gehörten zu den Welpen Malteser, Bulldoggen, Boxer und Pudel.
Doch bei dem Anblick mussten die Polizisten erst einmal schlucken: Die 101 Hundewelpen lagen zusammengepfercht in winzigen Käfigen und wimmerten laut um Hilfe. Die Tiere sollten rund 2.000 Kilometer weit von der Slowakei nach Spanien gebracht werden.

Ein anonymer Hinweis führte die Polizei Samstag früh auf den Flughafen- Parkplatz K1 – ein heißer Tipp, wie sich herausstellte: 26 Hundewelpen, zusammengepfercht in enge Boxen, schauten die Beamten mit traurigen Augen an





Psi na crno – Manual za švercere

Psi i mačke na crno, novo ljeto – novi rekordi.

  1. Zaprepaštenje velikim brojkama napuštenih životinja koje se već duži niz  godina voze put Njemačke  iz azila i “šinteraja” Hrvatske i ostalih država bivše Jugoslavije .
  1. Organizirani šverc pojedinaca , domaćih i međunarodnih Udruga s ciljem kako doći do brze zarade ” na crno* pri čemu je dobrobit životinje na žnj mjestu ljestvice kriterija.
  1. Napušteni psi i mačke iz zemalja ex Jugoslavije prebacuju se za Njemačku pod lažnom izlikom udomljenja i potom prodaju za komercijalne iznose od 280 Eur po psu, a nakon što su većinom sve za troškove putovanja, sterilizacije, liječenja i cijepljenja sakupili online putem “chip in”ili “pay pall” donacija od strane naivnih dobročinitelja.ŠVERC NAPUŠTENIM PSIMA  =
    prevara motivom;
    manipulacija donatorima i volonterima;
    masovni, organizirani planirani  transporti iz jedne države u drugu bez legalnih dokumenata ;
    uvijek iste osobe u organizaciji ;
    prijevoz bez unaprijed definiranog udomitelja
    smještaj životinja u nekontroliranim uvjetima;
    neuvjetan prijevoz velikih brojki;
    prodaja po komercijalnoj osnovi bez računa:
    natransparentnost informacija;
    prijetnje osobi koja pita informacije   =  PSEĆA CAMORRA

                                                                                   Osjećate li se prevarenim?

Op.a. : Naravno da u tom svijetu ima divnih , poštenih pojedinaca i organizacija koje požrtvovno i odgovorno skrbe o napuštenim životinjama ali ovo nije tekst o njima nego tekst o …  drugima

  • RAZVOJNI PROCES  sindroma napuštanja velikog broja kućnih ljubimaca

Atraktivnost ideje o držanju kućnog ljubimca, po stanovima, pitanje je novijeg datuma.

Aktualne brojke  kućnih ljubimaca odražavaju osjećaje, vjerovanja i stavove suvremenog društva po kojima bi
kućni ljubimci trebali , svojom pojavom. životni prostor suvremenog čovjeka učiniti ugodnijim.

Čovjek , nabavkom kućnog ljubimca,  često zanemaruje njihove osnovne životne potrebe i sve ono što je njihovu životinjsku prirodu učinilo svojstvenom.

Životinja se bira nasumce, s puno manje informacije nego kad se kupuje novi model mobitela i bez  svjesnosti da je to duga i ozbiljna obveza sa jako puno odricanja.

Životinja se drži po kavezima stanova, dvorišta ili azila  što često rezultira time da nakon početnog oduševljenja novom igračkom, a radi obveza vlasnika, njima bude uskraćena osnovna potreba slobodnog gibanja u prirodi, a često i hrane i vode  te veterinarske skrbi.

Suvremeni čovjek sklon je sebi pojednostaviti život čim moguće i tako se pojavio , paralalno sa kućnim ljubimcima i sindrom napuštanja velikog broja kućnih ljubimaca.

Establishment ne polaže neku veću pažnju na taj segmenti pa se  razvio paralelni sustav upravljanja i kontrole napuštenim životinjama international.

Volonteri international , Udruge, Organizacije, Zaklade, zaštitari, animalisti, mučenici ali i šverceri ,manipulatori , rame uz rame, upravljaju životima napuštenih životinja po svome !

Bez ikakve kontrole institucija.

Facebook je virtualno selo putem kojeg  se na tisuće životinja mjesečno spašava sa okrutnog Istoka u imaginarni Zapad!

Ex ljubimci, a sada stanari ulica, azila ili šinteraja  udomljavaju se kao da je riječ o igri Monopoli  ili Tamagotchi-ju.

Izgubila se svaka  mjera, vrte se velike brojke što je prvi znak da u igri  sudjeluju prevaranti.

-Corina Ana : ABONDED WITH FEW DAYS BEFORE HIS DEPARTURE TO GERMANY! adoption/foster is needed URGENTLY for Figo which transport is already booked! Please SHARE! THANK YOU

URGENT! URGENT in need of home, puppy on street that is in danger of being taken my dog catchers or in best case to spend his life time in chains :((( He was brought in the neighborhood by someone and left there on mercy of others. They dont even bother to feed him and dont care of the danger he is put, they are not ev…See more
Photos: 20


Čov jek i životinja,  bez sumnje, mogu ostvariti ugodan, psihološki , međusobni odnos . No trgovački odnos  u kojem je prevara light motiv, a patnja životinje koristi  se kao mamac  za naivce, je sasvim nešto drugo.

  1. Ovo je svjedočanstvo prevari i manipulacijama uz izliku lažnih udomljenja u inozemstvo!
  1. Svi primjeri navedeni u tekstu su istiniti, a imena su izmišljena
    neki od nadimaka su prenesena sa FB profila putem kojih se dnevno vrti bezbroj oglasa te promovira nelegalna trgovina napuštenim životinjama sa Istoka i Juga Europe ,koje  se masovno odvoze put Njemačke bez kontrole nadležnih institucija za zaštitu životinja )


Manipulatori su žilava rasa , lako se prilagode novim trendovima i nepogrešivo znaju nanjušiti ljudsku slabost.
Prodati će vam sve .
Magične krpe za prašinu , čudesnu kremu za podmlađivanje, lutriju kojom ćete zaraditi milijune i pričicu u kojoj ćete se osjećati dijelom crno bijelog svijeta u kojem žive ljudi koji muče i ljudi koji životinje spašavaju.

Vragovi i anđeli.
Po manipulatorima nema trećih.
Ili si s njima ili protiv njih.
Njihov je svijet elementaran,a cilj jasan, bez dileme.

Nema prostora za pitanja ili kritičku raspravu!

Nema pauze djelovanja da bi se osiguralo kvalitetno udomljenje.
Kod švercera je sve u velkim brojkama,  užurbano, naveliko, agresivno, komercijala

Na pitanje  o sudbini životinje koju su utovarili u kombi firme “Put za topli dom!” obično slijedi niz uvreda, galame i prijetnji.
Uz ignoriranje odgovora.

Bez empatije do životinje koju voze ilegalno preko granice, bez dokumentacije.

Pred desetak je dana, beogradsku scenu zaštitara potresla vijest da je zaustavljen transport sa 12 uličnih pasa iz Beograda , ilegalno prevezenih u Njemačku , pod izgovorom udomljenja u Njemačku i Austriju u kojoj je sudjelovao veći broj organizatora.

Pse je spasila njemačka policija i jedan se pas još uvijek traži.

No manipulatore , novčana kazna neće zaustaviti sa rabotom.

Prilog pismo kojeg je jedna od organizatorica navedenog ilegalnog transporta iz Beograda put Njemačke , 2012. objavila na svom FB profilu objavljujemo u cjelosti.

Ana Kojic, Belgrade, Serbia:
“My dear German friends, I sincerely apologize for inappropriate behavior of some people from my country. Please understand they are poor people, and the level of their culture and communication is very low. Please accept my apology and let’s continue with saving animals lives. This people will be blocked now and I recommend you to do the same. Thank you so much for all your help!
” Свиђа ми се · · Подели · Пре око сат времена ·04.02.2012. Beograd

  • I to je drugi znak da imate posla sa manipulatorima, švercerima. Agresija i netransparentnost.

  • NJEMAČKA, HUNDEPARADISE!?♣LJESTVICA PODJELE SVIJETA PO ŠVERCERIMA, MANIPULATORIMA1.  Njemačka, raj za pse2. Austrija, raj za pse ( malo manji od njemačkog raja )3. Švicarska, raj za pse ( nešto  malo manji od austrijskog )

    4.  Klupica pripada Holandiji ( raj za pse, malo manji od njemačkog,
    austrijskog i švicarskog )

    Zatim slijedi pakao  gdje spadaju  sve ostale države svijeta .Najcrnji pakao : Ukrajina!
  • .Oglas ( primjer psa iz Srbije koji je hitno odveden put Njemačke pod izlikom da je udomljen,
    a potom se pojavljuje u oglasniku tijekom  12.2011 po cijeni od 150 Eur,
    u 01.2012. po cijeni od 250 Eur  i još uvijek nema “dom”To je treći znak da imate posla sa švercerima, maniuplatorima

I tako je internet postao “El dorado” za  novu vrstu prevaranata: šverceri napuštenih životinja.

Krenulo je to otprilike u isto vrijeme kada su manipulatori shvatili da je suvremeni čovjek iz Srbije, Njemačke,  Hrvatske , Italije ili neke druge države spreman uložiti puno i spreman potrošiti puno novaca da bi spasio život neke nepoznate, napuštene, nesretne životinje za čiju je sudbinu saznao preko interneta.


      • MANUAL ZA ŠVERCERA INTLManipulator masovno, planski, organizirano, ilegalno, prevozi velike količine životinja po uvijek istoj shemi nabavke za Njemačku iz Hrvatske, Srbije, Bosne, Mađarske,Italije,Poljske, Turske,Španjolske, Moldavije, Ukrajine, Maldiva, Egipta …
      • Manual:1. Nađi napuštene pse i/ ili mačke iz vrlo udaljene zemlje o kojoj ne znaš ništa.
        Pritom je sasvim irelevantno ukoliko smjestiš Šibenik u Mađarsku.2. Otvori FB profil ili web stranicu sa puno potresnih fotografija mučenih životinja koje ne moraju biti  iz baš te države ( ne vidi narod dobro ako ima suzne oči)

        3. Na FB profilu složi puno albuma sa anđelima i po mogućnosti u svakoj se drugoj rečenici pozovi
        na  nekog boga. Tako će ljudi steći dojam da si bogobojazna , milosredna osoba
        4. Pokupi fotografije svih pasa koje nađeš online i objavi da ih udomljuješ u Njemačkoj, ti osobno, ionako te nitko neće pitati gdje ih udomljuješ5. Obrati se Mark Rogers-u, on je tip top fatza za složit srcedrapateljne priče o psima iz Bosne npr.
        Nema veze što on stanuje u Velikoj Britaniji6. On je također majstor za otvoriti pal pall i čip in za donacije.  Nije skup. Radi puno.

        7. Isto pravilo vrijedi i za Sinjas Hundehilfe npr.  ( ona stanuje u Njemačkoj pa ti možda bliže)

        8.  Pričice moraju sadržavati pojmove poput ” Mother Mary, usamljenoj kujici sa 7-8 štenaca*
        To jako dobro djeluje na donatore.
        Još bolje ako nađeš uličnog psa bez noge ili azil bez grijanja. To barem danas nije teško naći.

        9. Otvori CHIP IN online kasicu za sakupljanje novaca i nađi posrednika koji ima puno prijatelja među
        zaštitarima international

        10. Nađi prijatelja koji će uplatiti prvu donaciju tako da navuće ostale. Uvijek će se netko naći tko će uplatiti i 100 Eur potom.

        11. Jedan iz organizacije ostaje blagajnik.
        Izabereš “primitivnu” državu poput Balkana, Italije ili Rumunjske jer ljudi ne govore njemački pa ćeš ih lakše nagovoritida si pse već udomio kad stigneš po nove

        12. Čim vidiš da je krenulo sa sakupljanjem donacija, organiziraš online škvadru švercera da se prijave kao dobrovoljci -udomitelji u Njemačkoj. To narod voli i driješi kesu.
        Naravno, oni neće udomiti životinju.
        Oni tek služe kao usputno stajalište gdje se životinje tjedno iskrcavaju, uvijek druge, sve dok ih se negdje ne proda.
        Na njemačkom se to kaže “foster” ;)p odnosno Pflegestelle.
        To su mjesta gdje dobrovoljci preuzimaju inozemne pse i za takvu uslugu dobiju novac.

        NIKADA nećeš priznati da je to privremeni udomitelj!
        Objaviš par fotografija iz serije psi u mom dnevnom boravku, psi na zelenoj travi, psi na svilenim jastucima . U međuvremenu ih držiš tamo gdje im je mjseto .Ako se nečiji podrum može tako zvati.

        13. Kada si prikupio sredstva, organiziraš još jednu akciju prikupljanja sredstava za prijevoz.
        Iz Sarajeva tako npr. vozi A.A.S. za 80 EUR po psu.
        U auto stane 15 pasa x 80 Eura = taman za rezervoar benzina ;)p

        14. Najaviš transport online ( tako da te policija može susresti i oduzeti ti pse )
        Pardon, greška u tipkanju

        15. Ne najaviš transport online nego kreneš skrivečki do Salzburga. Tvoj partner iz Mađarske je već krenuo prema Srbiji.
        Partner iz Niša će dovesti pse do Beograda. Tamo ih preuzima Ana i Dejan i voze dalje.
        Nađi nekoga da im plati sendvič jer ljudi nemaju.

        16. Ukoliko tvoj partner ne radi na mađarskoj granici, produžiti ćeš za slovensku.
        Negdje ćeš  proći bez da prijaviš pse. Za TITAR test i ostale gluposti nisi trošio jer baš te briga ako su zdravi. Neki od njih će valjda preživjeti put,a ako ne preživi ima ih još.17.

        17.Uspio si preći granicu uz pomoć. Selebrity rules.

        18. Sinjas Hundehilfe je već organizirala ekipu koja jednog psa skida sa transporta u Austriji, dva šalje za Švicarsku, tri baca u jarak jer su ružni, petog i šestog šalje Sandri, sedmog i sve do 15-tog ide Tamari.

        19. Tamari još nije stigla uplata od fostera od protekli tjedan iz Rumunjske i buni se jer niti socijalna pomoć nije stigla pa joj treba poslati nešto novaca od drugih fostera koji su uzeli 5 od prošle ture
        i uspjeli su ih prodati za 250 Eur po psu nekim naivcima koje su uvjerili da su to psi iz njemačkog uzgoja, jer su registrirani preko TASSO.

        Moraš joj dati nešto love jer inače neće glumiti udomitelja kao što se Elfi nedavno naljutila.

        20. Kada te one “budale” iz Sarajeva ili Beograda budu pitale gdje su psi udomljeni, dobro se izdaeri na njih i reci im da im nikada nećeš reći gdje su psi jer oni to ne zaslužuju!

        21. Ukoliko te policija zaustavi tijekom slijedećg transporta i oduzme ti pse, ne brini.
        Organizacija je iza tebe. Pokriti će troškove umjesto tebe.
        Ti samo moraš šutjeti i tupiti pričicu od divnim udomljenjima jer uvijek će biti ovaca koje će ti povjerovati.

        Slijedeći put kada Organizacija ode u Mađarsku po novi transport imaš besplatnu kartu za ZOO:
        Ludo su se cure zabavljale prošli put kad su pošle po štenad.
        Najprije ZOO gdje su se dobro ismijale sa životinjama po kavezima pa večerica i pijanka, a ujutro u azil gdje će volonteri ukrcat jedno 50 kg žive vage pasa i put za Njemačku!

        22. Naravno da nećeš volonterima iz Bgd koji se dnevno smrzavaju da prehrane pse koje je Grad Beograd sterilizirao o svom trošku,a koje si ti prevezao za Njemačku bez dokumentacije i bez titar testa reći da si prodao svakog psa po 250 Eura, bez da si centa potrošio za hranu!

        Ta što bi rekao vlasnik psa da sazna da je njegov pas bio ulični pas??!!

        Ta šta bi rekao ono siroče od volontera iz Beograda, Sarajeva, Rijeke ili Zagreba ili Španjolske ili Poljske ili Italije da zna da si psa za kojeg on krvari prodao nekom  preko weba?
        Bez računa i bez mogućnosti da uvjetuješ
        dom jer ionako nemaš papire za njega. Sve je to na crno.

        23. One pse koje ne prodaš šalješ za Francusku i Dreilande.
        Ima i jedno skladište kraj mađarske granice.
        Tamo se drže psi koji nisu prodani u prvoj turi ili koje je vlasnik vratio jer su prestrašeni, tužni i istramuatizirani “divnim, toplim, domom”
        U ove dane se jedno takvo skladište prepunilo po šavovima i moraju eutanazirati 60 pasa, mahom je većina labradora.
        Predivni psi, ali istraumatizirani, prestrašeni, neudomljivi. Ušao im strah u kosti nakon silnog seljakanja od ruke u ruku i sada, kada se javlja potreba za eutanazijom, nema “udomitelja?”
        Kako to?
        No karavane voze i dalje…Sitnica poput eutanazije 60 pasa u Francuskoj gdje je vjerovatno završio veći broj pasa koji nisu prodani ne zamara manipulatore.
        Njima su zanimljivija nova tržišta.

        Za rezervu se obrati Raphaelli koja će snimiti puno slikica na svili i zelenoj travi.
        Lupiš onako od oka imena i države, pas ko pas, tko mari više jel Šibenik u Mađarskoj ili nije ili da li Srbi govore rumunjski?

        Ili to što ti konkurenciju rade i neke jače organizacije poput npr. one koja je preuzela
        250 pasa iz Niša i prodala ih putem weba za 250 Eur po psu.
        LINK :,3,0,2,15.html

        Hrvatska :

        Hrvatska :


        Nickname sa bankom podataka svih napuštenih pasa iz Europe koje prevoze za Njemačku potom; kao Sinjas Hundehilfe ili Regina Dittrich ili još bezbroj istih profesionalki biznisom napuštenih

        Ili ova lakrdija gdje pse iz Rumunjske “spašavaju” za SAD jer će inače zločesti domaći velike pse
        ( sa puno mesa) poslati za Kinu??? boing
        copy:Liliana Ambrus
        SHARE SHARE SHARE PLEASE SHARE: Actionfor Romaniananimals
        Please crosspost and share in all groups: There is a trend for larger dogs being adopted by scum to send to Asia, bigger dogs = more meat :O( Please please please do homechecks and be very particular when rehoming large breeds/dogs

        LINK :

        24.Sve pse koje ne uspiješ prodati – nestati će bez traga. ….

        Možda Univerzitet u Poitieru, koji legalno provodi eksperimente na psima, računa na to

        LINK :

      • ————————————————Obzirom na velik, na prevelik broj pasa iz segmenta napuštenih, uličnih, azilskih, šinterajskih pasa koji se iz :
    • Italije
      TurskeThailanda…………………….voze za Njemačku i tamo “spašavaju” nešto ne valja
  • od 250 Eur do 380 Eur po psu.Mladi, stari, grbavi, trudni, štenad,lijepi, ružni, zdravi, bolesni ….karavane prolaze

Otvaraju se cargo letovi za napuštene pse iz Rumunjske put SAD-a
Uskoro se otvara cargo iz Sarajeva.

Putevi manipulatora su skučeni, svi oni tabaju istim stazama, bez obzira na zemlju u kojoj stanuju.